Alexander Gwen L, Divine George W, Couper Mick P, McClure Jennifer B, Stopponi Melanie A, Fortman Kristine K, Tolsma Dennis D, Strecher Victor J, Johnson Christine Cole
Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2008 May;34(5):382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.028.
With the growing use of Internet-based interventions, strategies are needed to encourage broader participation. This study examined the effects of combinations of monetary incentives and mailing characteristics on enrollment, retention, and cost effectiveness for an online health program.
In 2004, a recruitment letter was mailed to randomly selected Midwestern integrated health system members aged 21-65 and stratified by gender and race/ethnicity; recipients were randomly pre-assigned to one of 24 combinations of incentives and various mailing characteristics. Enrollment and 3-month retention rates were measured by completion of online surveys. Analysis, completed in 2005, compared enrollment and retention factors using t tests and chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression modeling assessed the probability of enrollment and retention.
Of 12,289 subjects, 531 (4.3%) enrolled online, ranging from 1% to 11% by incentive combination. Highest enrollment occurred with unconditional incentives, and responses varied by gender. Retention rates ranged from 0% to 100%, with highest retention linked to higher-value incentives. The combination of a $2 bill prepaid incentive and the promise of $20 for retention (10% enrollment and 71% retention) was optimal, considering per-subject recruitment costs ($32 enrollment, $70 retention) and equivalent enrollment by gender and race/ethnicity.
Cash incentives improved enrollment in an online health program. Men and women responded differently to mailing characteristics and incentives. Including a small prepaid monetary incentive ($2 or $5) and revealing the higher promised-retention incentive was cost effective and boosted enrollment.
随着基于互联网的干预措施使用的增加,需要制定策略以鼓励更广泛的参与。本研究考察了货币激励措施与邮件特征的组合对一项在线健康计划的注册、留存率和成本效益的影响。
2004年,向随机抽取的年龄在21 - 65岁之间、按性别和种族/族裔分层的中西部综合医疗系统成员邮寄了一封招募信;收件人被随机预先分配到24种激励措施与各种邮件特征的组合之一。通过在线调查的完成情况来衡量注册率和3个月留存率。2005年完成的分析使用t检验和卡方检验比较了注册和留存因素。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了注册和留存的概率。
在12289名受试者中,531人(4.3%)进行了在线注册,按激励措施组合不同,注册率在1%至11%之间。无条件激励措施下的注册率最高,且反应因性别而异。留存率在0%至100%之间,最高留存率与更高价值的激励措施相关。考虑到每位受试者的招募成本(注册成本32美元,留存成本70美元)以及按性别和种族/族裔的同等注册情况,2美元预付费激励措施与20美元留存承诺的组合(注册率10%,留存率71%)是最优的。
现金激励提高了在线健康计划的注册率。男性和女性对邮件特征和激励措施的反应不同。包含小额预付费货币激励(2美元或5美元)并透露更高的留存承诺激励措施具有成本效益且能提高注册率。