Betts R F, George S D, Rundell R B, Freeman R B, Douglas R G
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Aug;4(2):151-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.2.151-156.1976.
Three different tests for detection of antibodies to human cytomegalovirus (CMV), complement fixing with antigen prepared by freeze-thaw disruption (CF-FT) or with antigen prepared by extraction with alkaline glycine buffer (CF-GE) and immunofluorescent staining (FA), were compared in renal transplant recipients and their healthy donors, FA and CF-GE tests yielded positive results at an identical and significantly higher frequency than CF-FT in both donors and recipients. CF-GE and FA performed on donors and recipients predicted all virus shedding post-transplant, whereas CF-FT did not. In the individuals who developed primary infection concurrent with the transplanted kidney, FA developed earlier than other antibodies in about one-half and at the same time in the remainder. In addition, the FA test could be completed more quickly and all sera could be interpreted, which made the FA test more useful than the CF-GE, but both of these tests were clearly superior to CF-FT.
在肾移植受者及其健康供体中,对三种检测人巨细胞病毒(CMV)抗体的不同试验进行了比较,即采用冻融破坏法制备的抗原进行补体结合试验(CF-FT)、采用碱性甘氨酸缓冲液提取法制备的抗原进行补体结合试验(CF-GE)以及免疫荧光染色法(FA)。在供体和受者中,FA试验和CF-GE试验呈阳性结果的频率相同且显著高于CF-FT试验。对供体和受者进行的CF-GE试验和FA试验可预测移植后所有的病毒脱落情况,而CF-FT试验则不能。在与移植肾同时发生原发性感染的个体中,约一半个体的FA试验比其他抗体出现得早,其余个体中FA试验与其他抗体同时出现。此外,FA试验完成得更快,所有血清均可解读,这使得FA试验比CF-GE试验更有用,但这两种试验均明显优于CF-FT试验。