Rao N, Waruszewski D T, Armstrong J A, Atchison R W, Ho M
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Dec;6(6):633-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.6.633-638.1977.
The anti-complement immunofluorescence (ACIF) technique was evaluated for the diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in a group of sera derived from renal transplant recipients and donors by comparing it with the indirect immunofluorescence (FA) and complement fixation (CF) TESTS. The ACIF and FA tests yielded similar results. However, the ACIF test had a distinct advantage over the indirect FA test, since it eliminated the nonspecific cytoplasmic staining that may result in false positive readings in inexperienced hands. Both the indirect FA and ACIF tests were more sensitive than the CF test. In primary CMV infection, the FA and ACIF antibodies appeared earlier and had significantly higher titer than corresponding CF titers. This difference in titers was not seen in seropositive individuals who lacked overt infection. Our previously reported correlation between the seropositivity of the donor and CMV infection in seronegative recipients has been confirmed.
通过将抗补体免疫荧光(ACIF)技术与间接免疫荧光(FA)和补体结合(CF)试验进行比较,对一组来自肾移植受者和供者的血清进行了评估,以诊断人巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染。ACIF和FA试验得出了相似的结果。然而,ACIF试验相对于间接FA试验具有明显优势,因为它消除了可能在经验不足的人手中导致假阳性读数的非特异性细胞质染色。间接FA和ACIF试验都比CF试验更敏感。在原发性CMV感染中,FA和ACIF抗体出现得更早,且滴度明显高于相应的CF滴度。在没有明显感染的血清阳性个体中未观察到这种滴度差异。我们之前报道的供者血清阳性与血清阴性受者中CMV感染之间的相关性得到了证实。