Hulleman Johan, Humphreys Glyn W
Department of Psychology, University of Hull, UK.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 May;24(3):279-91. doi: 10.1080/02643290601181890.
In neuropsychological research, it is frequently necessary to compare the performance of a single case with that of a control sample. Recently, there has been a discussion about whether existing methods are adequate in preventing Type 1 errors due to increased variability in the single-case data (Crawford, Garthwaite, Howell, & Gray, 2004; Mitchell, Mycroft, & Kay, 2004; Mycroft, Mitchell, & Kay, 2002) and about the power of any comparisons. In this paper, we propose an extension of the modified t test introduced by Crawford and Howell (1998). We provide Monte Carlo simulations that show that it is possible to increase the power of the modified t test by retesting the single case. We also make available a computer program that implements the method introduced in this paper and that can be used by neuropsychologists to test for a difference between a single case and a control group. We apply our procedure to an example of a patient examined on the "Pyramids and Palm Trees" test.
在神经心理学研究中,经常需要将单个案例的表现与对照组样本的表现进行比较。最近,关于现有方法是否足以防止由于单个案例数据变异性增加而导致的I类错误(Crawford、Garthwaite、Howell和Gray,2004年;Mitchell、Mycroft和Kay,2004年;Mycroft、Mitchell和Kay,2002年)以及任何比较的功效,一直存在讨论。在本文中,我们提出了对Crawford和Howell(1998年)引入的修正t检验的扩展。我们提供的蒙特卡罗模拟表明,通过对单个案例进行重新测试,可以提高修正t检验的功效。我们还提供了一个计算机程序,该程序实现了本文介绍的方法,神经心理学家可以使用它来测试单个案例与对照组之间的差异。我们将我们的程序应用于一名接受“金字塔和棕榈树”测试的患者的示例。