卷尾猴的损失厌恶现象
On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys.
作者信息
Silberberg Alan, Roma Peter G, Huntsberry Mary E, Warren-Boulton Frederick R, Sakagami Takayuki, Ruggiero Angela M, Suomi Stephen J
机构信息
American University, Washington, DC 20016-8062, USA.
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Mar;89(2):145-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-145.
Abstract
Chen, Lakshminarayanan, and Santos (2006) claim to show in three choice experiments that monkeys react rationally to price and wealth shocks, but, when faced with gambles, display hallmark, human-like biases that include loss aversion. We present three experiments with monkeys and humans consistent with a reinterpretation of their data that attributes their results not to loss aversion, but to differences between choice alternatives in delay of reinforcement.
摘要
陈、拉克什米纳拉亚南和桑托斯（2006年）声称，在三项选择实验中表明，猴子对价格和财富冲击做出了理性反应，但在面对赌博时，却表现出包括损失厌恶在内的典型的、类似人类的偏差。我们用猴子和人类进行了三项实验，这些实验与对他们数据的重新解释一致，该解释将他们的结果归因于强化延迟中选择选项之间的差异，而非损失厌恶。
相似文献
1
On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys.卷尾猴的损失厌恶现象
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Mar;89(2):145-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-145.
2
Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys.卷尾猴的禀赋效应
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3837-44. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0149.
3
Attending to the outcome of others: disadvantageous inequity aversion in male capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).关注其他个体的结果：雄性卷尾猴（僧帽猴）中的不利不公平厌恶现象
Am J Primatol. 2008 Sep;70(9):901-5. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20576.
4
Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect.卷尾猴、公平厌恶与挫折效应。
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Feb;120(1):67-73. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.67.
5
Human risky choice in a repeated-gambles procedure: an up-linkage replication of Lakshminarayanan, Chen and Santos (2011).重复赌博程序中的人类风险选择：拉克希米纳拉亚南、陈和桑托斯（2011年）的上行关联复制
Anim Cogn. 2013 Nov;16(6):907-14. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0623-1. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
6
Learning and limits of use of eye gaze by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in an object-choice task.卷尾猴（僧帽猴）在物体选择任务中对目光注视的学习及使用限制
J Comp Psychol. 2000 Jun;114(2):200-7. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.2.200.
7
Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse?卷尾猴（白喉卷尾猴）是否厌恶不公平？
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1223-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3433.
8
Effect of practice on hand preference on a color visual discrimination task by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴（僧帽猴）在颜色视觉辨别任务中练习对手偏好的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Dec;95(3 Pt 2):1027-34. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.3f.1027.
9
How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?簇绒卷尾猴（僧帽猴）如何理解工具使用中涉及的因果关系？
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jul;29(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233.
10
Activity budget, diet, and habitat use in the critically endangered Ka'apor capuchin monkey (Cebus kaapori) in Pará State, Brazil: a preliminary comparison to other capuchin monkeys.巴西帕拉州极度濒危的卡阿波尔卷尾猴（Cebus kaapori）的活动预算、饮食及栖息地利用：与其他卷尾猴的初步比较
Am J Primatol. 2014 Oct;76(10):919-31. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22277. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Conceptual preferences can be transmitted via selective social information use between competing wild bird species.概念偏好可以通过竞争中的野生鸟类物种之间对社会信息的选择性利用来传递。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jun 15;9(6):220292. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220292. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Trends in Behavior-Analytic Gambling Research and Treatment.行为分析赌博研究与治疗的趋势
Behav Anal. 2015 Jun 5;38(2):179-202. doi: 10.1007/s40614-015-0027-4. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Problematic Internet Users Show Impaired Inhibitory Control and Risk Taking with Losses: Evidence from Stop Signal and Mixed Gambles Tasks.问题性互联网用户在面对损失时表现出抑制控制受损和冒险行为：来自停止信号和混合赌博任务的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;7:370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00370. eCollection 2016.
4
Social comparison mediates chimpanzees' responses to loss, not frustration.社会比较介导黑猩猩对损失的反应，而非挫折感。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Nov;17(6):1303-11. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0765-9. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
5
Experience-based decisions and brain activity: three new gaps and partial answers.基于经验的决策与大脑活动：三个新差距及部分答案
Front Psychol. 2012 Jan 5;2:390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00390. eCollection 2011.
6
To Take Risk is to Face Loss: A Tonic Pupillometry Study.冒险即面临损失：一项瞳孔测量研究
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 22;2:344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00344. eCollection 2011.
7
Token reinforcement: a review and analysis.代币强化：综述与分析
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Mar;91(2):257-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257.
本文引用的文献
1
Pointing At Smaller Food Amounts In An Analogue Of Boysen And Berntson's (1995) Procedure.在模拟博伊森和伯恩森（1995年）的实验过程中指向较少数量的食物。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):143-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-143.
2
Commitment, choice and self-control.承诺、选择和自我控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15.
3
Choice and delay of reinforcement.选择与延迟强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67.
4
A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.一种用于具有延迟和概率性奖励的选择的折扣框架。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.
5
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.作为强化频率函数的反应相对强度和绝对强度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):267-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
6
Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).对数量的反应：黑猩猩（Pan troglodytes）的感知与认知机制
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.1.82.
Zotero 插件