Tuteja Ashok K, Talley Nicholas J, Joos Sandra K, Tolman Keith G, Hickam David H
George E. Wahlen V.A. Medical Center, and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1241-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01755.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
BACKGROUND Bloating is common, but its significance as a marker of underlying disease has not been defined. AND AIMS: We report on risk factors for bloating, its relationship to physical activity and quality of life (QOL), and its predictive value for functional bowel disorders.
This is a cross-sectional population-based study of 1,069 employees of the Veterans Affairs Black Hills Health Care System. The validated Bowel Disease Questionnaire was used to identify subjects with abdominal bloating and other bowel disorders. The association of bloating with QOL was assessed using the SF36 (Short-Form 36) questionnaire. Physical activity was assessed using the modified Baecke questionnaire.
The response rate was 72% (723 of 1,069). Bloating was reported by 21% of all subjects (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.7-23.7), 64% with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 35% with non-IBS constipation, 23% with non-IBS diarrhea, and 42% with dyspepsia. Functional bloating (i.e., bloating in the absence of other bowel disorders) was reported by 7% of subjects (95% CI 5.2-9.0). Of those with bloating, 28% had IBS, 25% non-IBS constipation, 8% non-IBS diarrhea, and 30% dyspepsia. The positive and negative predictive values of bloating in the diagnosis of functional bowel disorder were 66% and 87%, respectively. The only risk factors were smoking and high-dose aspirin. Bloating was not associated with physical activity. QOL on all subscales of SF36 was lower in subjects with bloating than those without bloating.
Bloating is a common symptom in otherwise healthy adults, and is often associated with but not predictive of functional bowel disorders. Smoking and high-dose aspirin are associated with bloating while physical activity is not.
背景 腹胀很常见,但其作为潜在疾病标志物的意义尚未明确。目的:我们报告腹胀的危险因素、其与身体活动及生活质量(QOL)的关系,以及其对功能性肠病的预测价值。
这是一项基于人群的横断面研究,研究对象为退伍军人事务黑山医疗系统的1069名员工。使用经过验证的肠道疾病问卷来识别有腹胀及其他肠道疾病的受试者。使用SF36(简短健康调查问卷36项)问卷评估腹胀与生活质量的关联。使用改良的贝克问卷评估身体活动情况。
应答率为72%(1069人中723人)。所有受试者中有21%报告有腹胀(95%置信区间[CI] 17.7 - 23.7),肠易激综合征(IBS)患者中有64%,非IBS便秘患者中有35%,非IBS腹泻患者中有23%,消化不良患者中有42%。7%的受试者报告有功能性腹胀(即无其他肠道疾病的腹胀)(95% CI 5.2 - 9.0)。在有腹胀的患者中,28%患有IBS,25%患有非IBS便秘,8%患有非IBS腹泻,30%患有消化不良。腹胀在功能性肠病诊断中的阳性和阴性预测值分别为66%和87%。仅有的危险因素是吸烟和高剂量阿司匹林。腹胀与身体活动无关。SF36所有子量表上,有腹胀的受试者的生活质量低于无腹胀的受试者。
腹胀是健康成年人中的常见症状,常与功能性肠病相关,但并非其预测指标。吸烟和高剂量阿司匹林与腹胀有关,而身体活动与之无关。