Suppr超能文献

重新思考耻辱感的理论方法:整合耻辱感规范影响的框架(FINIS)

Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: a Framework Integrating Normative Influences on Stigma (FINIS).

作者信息

Pescosolido Bernice A, Martin Jack K, Lang Annie, Olafsdottir Sigrun

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7000, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):431-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

Abstract

A resurgence of research and policy efforts on stigma both facilitates and forces a reconsideration of the levels and types of factors that shape reactions to persons with conditions that engender prejudice and discrimination. Focusing on the case of mental illness but drawing from theories and studies of stigma across the social sciences, we propose a framework that brings together theoretical insights from micro, meso and macro level research: Framework Integrating Normative Influences on Stigma (FINIS) starts with Goffman's notion that understanding stigma requires a language of social relationships, but acknowledges that individuals do not come to social interaction devoid of affect and motivation. Further, all social interactions take place in a context in which organizations, media and larger cultures structure normative expectations which create the possibility of marking "difference". Labelling theory, social network theory, the limited capacity model of media influence, the social psychology of prejudice and discrimination, and theories of the welfare state all contribute to an understanding of the complex web of expectations shaping stigma. FINIS offers the potential to build a broad-based scientific foundation based on understanding the effects of stigma on the lives of persons with mental illness, the resources devoted to the organizations and families who care for them, and policies and programs designed to combat stigma. We end by discussing the clear implications this framework holds for stigma reduction, even in the face of conflicting results.

摘要

对污名的研究和政策努力的复兴既促进又迫使人们重新审视那些塑造对患有导致偏见和歧视病症之人反应的因素的层面和类型。以精神疾病为例,并借鉴社会科学中有关污名的理论和研究,我们提出了一个框架,该框架整合了微观、中观和宏观层面研究的理论见解:整合污名规范影响框架(FINIS)始于戈夫曼的观点,即理解污名需要一种社会关系语言,但也承认个体进入社会互动时并非没有情感和动机。此外,所有社会互动都发生在一个背景中,在这个背景下,组织、媒体和更大的文化构建了规范期望,从而产生了标记“差异”的可能性。标签理论、社会网络理论、媒体影响的有限能力模型、偏见和歧视的社会心理学以及福利国家理论都有助于理解塑造污名的复杂期望网络。FINIS有潜力基于对污名对精神疾病患者生活的影响、投入到照顾他们的组织和家庭的资源以及旨在消除污名的政策和项目的理解,建立一个广泛的科学基础。我们最后讨论了即使面对相互矛盾的结果,这个框架对减少污名的明确启示。

相似文献

2
The Stigma Complex.耻辱情结
Annu Rev Sociol. 2015 Aug;41:87-116. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145702. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
The stigma of childhood mental disorders: a conceptual framework.儿童精神障碍的污名:一个概念框架。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;49(2):92-103; quiz 198. doi: 10.1097/00004583-201002000-00003.
10
Discrimination, stigma and mental health: what's next?歧视、污名化与心理健康:下一步该如何?
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2023 May-Jun;35(3-4):242-250. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2023.2186218. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Dehumanization: an integrative review.去人性化:一项综合综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):252-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.
6
The power gap: freedom, power and mental illness.权力差距:自由、权力与精神疾病
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2118-28. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.015. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
7
8
Psychiatric "survivors" and testimonies of self-harm.精神病“幸存者”与自我伤害的证词。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(8):1668-77. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.033. Epub 2005 Apr 22.
10
Some theoretical considerations.一些理论上的思考。
Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:80-90. doi: 10.1037/h0039515.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验