Suppr超能文献

分期双侧颈动脉支架置入术,高危患者的有效策略——一项前瞻性多中心试验的见解

Staged bilateral carotid stenting, an effective strategy in high-risk patients - insights from a prospective multicenter trial.

作者信息

Diehm Nicolas, Katzen Barry T, Iyer Sriram S, White Christopher J, Hopkins L Nelson, Kelley Lynne

机构信息

Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.035. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate outcomes of high-risk patients undergoing bilateral carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

A total of 747 patients at increased risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were enrolled in a prospective registry at 47 US sites of the Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial for Risk Surgical Patients (BEACH) trial. Among them, 78 (10.4%) patients underwent contralateral CAS > 30 days after the primary CAS procedure. Patients were followed at 1, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of non Q-wave myocardial infarction within 24 hours, periprocedural (<or=30 days) death, stroke or Q-wave MI, and late ipsilateral stroke or death due to neurological events from 31 days up to 12 months. The bilateral patients are independent from the pivotal cohort.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 885 + 320 days in the bilateral and 861 + 343 in the pivotal group. The primary endpoint occurred in 6.8% (5/73) of the bilateral patients and 8.9% (40/447) of the pivotal group (P = .66). There were no statistically significant differences between the bilateral and the pivotal groups with regard to any of the components of the primary or secondary endpoints. The univariate 1-year major adverse event (MAE) free survival was 93.6% and 91.6% in the bilateral and pivotal groups, respectively (P = .55). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustment for various clinical baseline factors revealed no differences in the primary endpoint when comparing the bilateral with the pivotal groups at 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.8673, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4590-1.6389, P = .66) or 1 year (OR: 0.9102, 95% CI 0.5503-1.5053, P = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral carotid stenting is an effective treatment strategy in patients determined to be at high-risk for CEA with no increase in morbidity or mortality results extended out to one year in a prospective multicenter trial.

摘要

目的

前瞻性评估接受双侧颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的高危患者的预后。

方法

共有747例颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)风险增加的患者被纳入波士顿科学公司EPI:高危手术患者颈动脉支架置入试验(BEACH试验)在美国47个地点的前瞻性登记研究。其中,78例(10.4%)患者在初次CAS手术后30天以上接受了对侧CAS。在1、6和12个月时对患者进行随访,此后每年随访3年。主要终点是24小时内非Q波心肌梗死、围手术期(≤30天)死亡、中风或Q波心肌梗死以及31天至12个月因神经事件导致的晚期同侧中风或死亡的累积发生率。双侧患者独立于关键队列。

结果

双侧患者的平均随访时间为885±320天,关键组为861±343天。主要终点在双侧患者中的发生率为6.8%(5/73),在关键组中的发生率为8.9%(40/447)(P = 0.66)。在主要或次要终点的任何组成部分方面,双侧组和关键组之间均无统计学显著差异。双侧组和关键组的单变量1年无主要不良事件(MAE)生存率分别为93.6%和91.6%(P = 0.55)。对各种临床基线因素进行调整的多变量逻辑回归分析显示,在30天时比较双侧组和关键组时,主要终点无差异(比值比[OR]:0.8673,95%置信区间[CI] 0.4590 - 1.6389,P = 0.66)或1年时(OR:0.9102,95% CI 0.5503 - 1.5053,P = 0.73)。

结论

在一项前瞻性多中心试验中,双侧颈动脉支架置入术是CEA高危患者的一种有效治疗策略,在长达一年的时间里发病率和死亡率均未增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验