Massop Douglas, Dave Rajesh, Metzger Christopher, Bachinsky Williams, Solis Maurice, Shah Rasesh, Schultz Greg, Schreiber Theodore, Ashchi Majdi, Hibbard Robbert
The Iowa Clinic, Des Moines, Iowa 50314, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):129-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21844.
Previously, the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection of Patients with High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) randomized trial showed that carotid artery stenting (CAS) was not inferior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of high-surgical risk patients.
The primary objective of the SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry is to evaluate 30-day major adverse events (MAE) after CAS performed by physicians with varied experience and utilizing a formal training program. Data will be analyzed on the overall patient population and by high-risk inclusion criteria.
SAPPHIRE Worldwide is a multicenter, prospective, postapproval registry to evaluate CAS with distal protection in patients at high-risk for surgery using the Cordis PRECISE Nitinol Stent and ANGIOGUARD XP/RX Emboli Capture Guidewire. Participating physicians are encouraged to treat patients according to their standard of practice and consistent with current Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling.
Enrollment began in October 2006. Data are available on the first 2,001 patients enrolled and followed to 30 days. Of these patients, the mean age was 72.2 +/- 9.75 yr; 62% were male; and 27.7% were symptomatic. Entry criteria for surgical high-risk included anatomic (n = 716), physiologic (n = 918), or both risk factors (n = 327). At 30-day follow-up, the MAE was 4.4% (death 1.1%, stroke 3.2%, MI 0.7%) for the overall population. Patients with anatomic risk had a significantly lower 30-day MAE than patients with physiologic risk (2.8% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.0306), respectively.
While the number of physicians performing CAS continues to increase, MAE rates seen in this registry (4.4%) are well within an acceptable range, as was first seen in the SAPPHIRE randomized trial (4.8%). A significant decrease in MAE was seen in patients with anatomic risk compared with physiologic risk factors. The SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry supports the use of CAS as an alternative to CEA in patients who are at high-risk for surgery due to anatomic risk factors.
此前,“高危患者动脉内膜切除术的支架置入与血管成形术保护”(SAPPHIRE)随机试验表明,在治疗高手术风险患者方面,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)不劣于颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。
SAPPHIRE全球注册研究的主要目的是评估由经验各异的医生进行CAS并采用正式培训项目后30天内的主要不良事件(MAE)。将对总体患者人群以及根据高危纳入标准进行数据分析。
SAPPHIRE全球研究是一项多中心、前瞻性、批准后注册研究,旨在使用Cordis PRECISE镍钛合金支架和ANGIOGUARD XP/RX栓子捕获导丝评估对手术高危患者进行的带有远端保护装置的CAS。鼓励参与的医生按照他们的执业标准并符合美国食品药品监督管理局当前批准的标签来治疗患者。
2006年10月开始入组。现有前2001例入组患者至30天的随访数据。这些患者的平均年龄为72.2±9.75岁;62%为男性;27.7%有症状。手术高危的入选标准包括解剖学(n = 716)、生理学(n = 918)或两者兼具的风险因素(n = 327)。在30天随访时,总体人群的MAE为4.4%(死亡1.1%,卒中3.2%,心肌梗死0.7%)。解剖学风险患者的30天MAE显著低于生理学风险患者(分别为2.8%对4.9%,P = 0.0306)。
虽然进行CAS的医生数量持续增加,但本注册研究中观察到的MAE发生率(4.4%)处于可接受范围内,正如在SAPPHIRE随机试验中首次观察到的(4.8%)那样。与生理学风险因素相比,解剖学风险患者的MAE显著降低。SAPPHIRE全球注册研究支持在因解剖学风险因素而手术高危的患者中使用CAS作为CEA的替代方法。