• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测腹膜透析患者的技术生存率:人工神经网络与逻辑回归的比较

Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression.

作者信息

Tangri Navdeep, Ansell David, Naimark David

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Sep;23(9):2972-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn187. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfn187
PMID:18441002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2517147/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early technique failure has been a major limitation on the wider adoption of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The objectives of this study were to use data from a large, multi-centre, prospective database, the United Kingdom Renal Registry (UKRR), in order to determine the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict early PD technique failure and to compare its performance with a logistic regression (LR)-based approach.

METHODS

The analysis included all incident PD patients enrolled in the UKRR from 1999 to 2004. The event of interest was technique failure. For both the ANN and LR analyses a bootstrap approach was used: the data were divided into 20 random training (75%) and validation (25%) sets. Models were derived on the latter and then used to make predictions on the former. Predictive accuracy was assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The 20 AUROC values and their standard errors were then averaged.

RESULTS

There were 3269 patients included in the analysis with a mean age of 59.9 years and a mean observation time of 430 days. Of the patients, 38.3% were female and 90.8% were Caucasian. 1458 patients (44.6%) suffered technique failure. The AUROC for the ANN model was 0.760 +/- 0.0167 and the LR model was 0.709 and 0.0208. (P = 0.0164)

CONCLUSIONS

Using UKRR data, both ANN and LR models predicted early PD technique failure with moderate accuracy. In this study, an ANN outperformed an LR-based approach. As the scope and the completeness of the UKRR increases, the question of whether more sophisticated ANN models will perform even better remains for further study.

摘要

背景

早期技术失败一直是腹膜透析(PD)广泛应用的主要限制因素。本研究的目的是利用来自大型多中心前瞻性数据库——英国肾脏注册中心(UKRR)的数据,以确定人工神经网络(ANN)模型预测早期PD技术失败的能力,并将其性能与基于逻辑回归(LR)的方法进行比较。

方法

分析纳入了1999年至2004年在UKRR登记的所有新发PD患者。感兴趣的事件是技术失败。对于ANN和LR分析,均采用自助法:将数据随机分为20个训练集(75%)和验证集(25%)。在验证集上推导模型,然后用于对训练集进行预测。通过ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)评估预测准确性。然后对20个AUROC值及其标准误差进行平均。

结果

分析纳入3269例患者,平均年龄59.9岁,平均观察时间430天。患者中,38.3%为女性,90.8%为白种人。1458例患者(44.6%)出现技术失败。ANN模型的AUROC为0.760±0.0167,LR模型的AUROC为0.709±0.0208。(P = 0.0164)

结论

利用UKRR数据,ANN和LR模型对早期PD技术失败均有中等程度的准确预测。在本研究中,ANN的表现优于基于LR的方法。随着UKRR范围和完整性的增加,更复杂的ANN模型是否会表现得更好仍有待进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/3b55cc10a74b/gfn187fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/ec39a9c9a18f/gfn187fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/ed90054e8193/gfn187fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/a3d96280c300/gfn187fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/2642d38dc168/gfn187fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/3b55cc10a74b/gfn187fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/ec39a9c9a18f/gfn187fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/ed90054e8193/gfn187fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/a3d96280c300/gfn187fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/2642d38dc168/gfn187fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/2638879/3b55cc10a74b/gfn187fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression.预测腹膜透析患者的技术生存率:人工神经网络与逻辑回归的比较
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Sep;23(9):2972-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn187. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
2
Prediction of premature all-cause mortality in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis using modified artificial neural networks.应用改良人工神经网络预测腹膜透析患者的全因过早死亡。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 May 13;13(10):14170-14184. doi: 10.18632/aging.203033.
3
Determining factors that predict technique survival on peritoneal dialysis: application of regression and artificial neural network methods.预测腹膜透析技术生存的决定因素:回归和人工神经网络方法的应用。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(2):c93-c100. doi: 10.1159/000319988. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
4
Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for predicting in-hospital mortality after primary liver cancer surgery.原发性肝癌手术后院内死亡率预测的人工神经网络和逻辑回归模型比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035781. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
5
Comparing an Artificial Neural Network to Logistic Regression for Predicting ED Visit Risk Among Patients With Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.比较人工神经网络与逻辑回归预测癌症患者 ED 就诊风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
A Comparison of Logistic Regression Model and Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting of Student's Academic Failure.逻辑回归模型与人工神经网络在预测学生学业失败中的比较
Acta Inform Med. 2015 Oct;23(5):296-300. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.296-300. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Model to predict prostate biopsy outcome in large screening population with independent validation in referral setting.
Urology. 2005 May;65(5):937-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.049.
8
[Application of recurrent neural network in prognosis of peritoneal dialysis].[循环神经网络在腹膜透析预后中的应用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Jun 18;51(3):602-608. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.034.
9
Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article.应用人工神经网络预测腰椎管狭窄症患者的手术满意度:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Mar;20(3):300-5. doi: 10.3171/2013.12.SPINE13674. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Predicting distant failure in early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT using clinical parameters.使用临床参数预测接受立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的远处失败情况。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jun;119(3):501-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
CliqueFluxNet: Unveiling EHR Insights with Stochastic Edge Fluxing and Maximal Clique Utilisation Using Graph Neural Networks.CliqueFluxNet:使用图神经网络通过随机边通量和最大团利用揭示电子健康记录见解
J Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Aug 1;8(3):555-575. doi: 10.1007/s41666-024-00169-2. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Improving Diagnostics with Deep Forest Applied to Electronic Health Records.深度学习森林在电子健康记录中的应用提高诊断能力。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;23(14):6571. doi: 10.3390/s23146571.
3
Artificial intelligence in peritoneal dialysis: general overview.

本文引用的文献

1
Urine biomarkers predict the cause of glomerular disease.尿液生物标志物可预测肾小球疾病的病因。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Mar;18(3):913-22. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006070767. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
2
Derivation and validation of a clinical index for prediction of rapid progression of kidney dysfunction.
QJM. 2007 Feb;100(2):87-92. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm001.
3
Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands.荷兰血液透析与腹膜透析生存率的比较。
Kidney Int. 2007 Jan;71(2):153-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002014. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
人工智能在腹膜透析中的应用:概述。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):682-687. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2064304.
4
Development of a scoring tool for predicting prolonged length of hospital stay in peritoneal dialysis patients through data mining.通过数据挖掘开发一种预测腹膜透析患者住院时间延长的评分工具。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Nov;8(21):1437. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1006.
5
An Equation Based on Fuzzy Mathematics to Assess the Timing of Haemodialysis Initiation.基于模糊数学的方程来评估血液透析起始时机。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 10;9(1):5871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37762-6.
6
The Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS): Unifying Efforts to Inform Practice and Improve Global Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis.腹膜透析结局与实践模式研究(PDOPPS):统一各方力量,为腹膜透析实践提供信息并改善全球治疗结局
Perit Dial Int. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):297-307. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00288. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
Simultaneous Catheter Replacement for Infectious and Mechanical Complications Without Interruption of Peritoneal Dialysis.在不中断腹膜透析的情况下同时更换导管以处理感染性和机械性并发症
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):182-7. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00313. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
Patterns Prediction of Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Cancer Cell lines Using FTIR Spectrum, Neural Network and Principal Components Analysis.使用傅里叶变换红外光谱、神经网络和主成分分析预测癌细胞系化疗敏感性的模式
Iran J Pharm Res. 2012 Spring;11(2):401-10.
9
Impact of hernias on peritoneal dialysis technique survival and residual renal function.疝对腹膜透析技术生存率和残余肾功能的影响。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):629-34. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00255. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
10
Mortality predicted accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic resection using artificial neural network.使用人工神经网络预测肝细胞癌肝切除患者的死亡率准确性。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Apr 30;2013:201976. doi: 10.1155/2013/201976. Print 2013.
4
Predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting with the application of an artificial neural network.应用人工神经网络预测术后恶心呕吐
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):60-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael282. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
5
Would artificial neural networks implemented in clinical wards help nephrologists in predicting epoetin responsiveness?在临床病房中应用人工神经网络会帮助肾病学家预测促红细胞生成素的反应性吗?
BMC Nephrol. 2006 Sep 18;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-7-13.
6
Comparison between neural networks and multiple logistic regression to predict acute coronary syndrome in the emergency room.神经网络与多元逻辑回归在急诊室预测急性冠状动脉综合征中的比较。
Artif Intell Med. 2006 Nov;38(3):305-18. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
7
Prediction of target range of intact parathyroid hormone in hemodialysis patients with artificial neural network.利用人工神经网络预测血液透析患者甲状旁腺激素的目标范围
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006 Aug;83(2):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
8
Neural network modeling to stratify peritoneal membrane transporter in predialytic patients.用于对透析前患者腹膜转运体进行分层的神经网络建模。
Intern Med. 2006;45(9):663-4. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1419. Epub 2006 Jun 1.
9
External validation of outcome prediction model for ureteral/renal calculi.输尿管/肾结石结局预测模型的外部验证
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00244-2.
10
Prediction of urinary protein markers in lupus nephritis.狼疮性肾炎中尿蛋白标志物的预测
Kidney Int. 2005 Dec;68(6):2588-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00730.x.