Tadaki Hiromi, Mochizuki Hiroyuki, Muramastu Reiko, Hagiwara Satomi, Mizuno Takahisa, Arakawa Hirokazu, Morikawa Akihiro
Department of Pediatrics and Developmental Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Apr;100(4):308-13. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60591-1.
Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. However, previous studies show that the offline value is lower than the online value.
To compare a standard offline eNO measurement apparatus with a modified apparatus that can monitor flow volume and respiratory pressure.
We studied 73 cooperative individuals aged 5 to 28 years (32 children: mean age, 8.3 years; 41 adults: mean age, 21.5 years). We modified the standard device by including a flow meter with a manometer and attaching a plastic tube connected to a 3-way valve to control the resistance. The online and offline (measured using the modified device and the standard device) eNO determinations were compared in a single session and were analyzed using a nitric oxide analyzer.
There was a good relationship between the online and modified offline eNO measurements in children. The modified offline method showed a stronger correlation with the online method (r = .97 vs. r = .92), and the modified offline eNO value was more similar to the online eNO value than to the standard offline value. The mean difference between the online and standard offline eNO values was 52%, whereas the mean difference between the online and modified offline eNO values was only 10%.
Using the offline method, we can easily control the resistance and flow volume to reach the same value measured by the online method in childhood respiratory diseases.
呼出一氧化氮(eNO)是气道炎症的一种非侵入性标志物。然而,既往研究表明离线值低于在线值。
比较标准离线eNO测量装置与一种可监测流量和呼吸压力的改良装置。
我们研究了73名年龄在5至28岁之间的合作个体(32名儿童:平均年龄8.3岁;41名成人:平均年龄21.5岁)。我们对标准装置进行了改良,增加了一个带有压力计的流量计,并连接一根塑料管至三通阀以控制阻力。在单次测量中比较了在线和离线(使用改良装置和标准装置测量)eNO测定值,并使用一氧化氮分析仪进行分析。
儿童在线和改良离线eNO测量值之间存在良好的相关性。改良离线方法与在线方法的相关性更强(r = 0.97对r = 0.92),改良离线eNO值与在线eNO值比与标准离线值更相似。在线和标准离线eNO值之间的平均差异为52%,而在线和改良离线eNO值之间的平均差异仅为10%。
采用离线方法,我们可以轻松控制阻力和流量,以在儿童呼吸系统疾病中达到与在线方法测量相同的值。