Ahn Jin-Soo, Lee Yong-Keun
Department of Dental Biomaterials Science and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.020. Epub 2008 May 2.
The objective of this study was to determine the differences in the translucency parameter (TP) of all-ceramic core, veneer and layered specimens relative to the CIE standard illuminant D(65), A and F2.
The A2-corresponding shade of seven all-ceramic core materials and one sintering ceramic as a reference were prepared in clinically relevant thicknesses (n = 7). The A2- and A3-corresponding shades of each recommended veneer ceramics were fabricated so that the thickness of the layered specimen was 1.5mm. The color of core, veneer and layered specimens was measured over white and black backgrounds relative to the illuminant D(65), A and F2 with a reflection spectrophotometer. TP value was obtained by calculating the color difference between the specimen over the white and that over the black background. Differences of TP values by the illuminant (DeltaTP) were analyzed with three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the fixed factors of the type of ceramic, the brand/thickness of ceramic within each type and the combination of illuminants (alpha = 0.05).
DeltaTP values were influenced by three factors based on three-way ANOVA. Higher translucent materials showed higher difference in TP value by the illuminants. TP(D(65)) was lower than TP(F2) and TP(A) values. Correlation coefficients between TP values relative to the different illuminants were higher than 0.994 (p<0.01).
Translucency of all-ceramic materials under daylight condition was lower than those under incandescent or fluorescent lamps. Therefore, this difference should be considered when shade matching translucent shades of all-ceramics.
本研究的目的是确定全瓷核、贴面和分层试件相对于CIE标准照明体D(65)、A和F2的半透明度参数(TP)的差异。
制备了七种全瓷核材料的A2对应色阶以及一种作为参考的烧结陶瓷,厚度为临床相关厚度(n = 7)。制备每种推荐的贴面陶瓷的A2和A3对应色阶,使分层试件的厚度为1.5mm。使用反射分光光度计在白色和黑色背景上相对于照明体D(65)、A和F2测量核、贴面和分层试件的颜色。通过计算试件在白色背景和黑色背景上的色差获得TP值。用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析照明体引起的TP值差异(DeltaTP),固定因素包括陶瓷类型、每种类型内陶瓷的品牌/厚度以及照明体的组合(α = 0.05)。
基于三因素方差分析,DeltaTP值受三个因素影响。半透明度较高的材料在照明体作用下TP值差异较大。TP(D(65))低于TP(F2)和TP(A)值。相对于不同照明体的TP值之间的相关系数高于0.994(p<0.01)。
全瓷材料在日光条件下的半透明度低于在白炽灯或荧光灯下的半透明度。因此,在匹配全瓷半透明色阶时应考虑这种差异。