Louie A, Heine H S, Kim K, Brown D L, VanScoy B, Liu W, Kinzig-Schippers M, Sörgel F, Drusano G L
Ordway Research Institute, 150 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jul;52(7):2486-96. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01439-07. Epub 2008 May 5.
Simulating the average non-protein-bound (free) human serum drug concentration-time profiles for linezolid in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, we characterized the pharmacodynamic parameter(s) of linezolid predictive of kill and for prevention of resistance in Bacillus anthracis. In 10-day dose-ranging studies, the average exposure for > or =700 mg of linezolid given once daily (QD) resulted in >3-log CFU/ml declines in B. anthracis without resistance selection. Linezolid at < or =600 mg QD amplified for resistance. With twice-daily (q12h) dosing, linezolid at > or =500 mg q12 h was required for resistance prevention. In dose fractionation studies, killing of B. anthracis was predicted by the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC)/MIC ratio. However, resistance prevention was linked to the maximum serum drug concentration (C(max))/MIC ratio. Monte Carlo simulations predicted that linezolid at 1,100 mg QD would produce in 96.7% of human subjects a free 24-h AUC that would match or exceed the average 24-h AUC of 78.5 mg x h/liter generated by linezolid at 700 mg QD while reproducing the shape of the concentration-time profile for this pharmacodynamically optimized regimen. However, linezolid at 700 mg q12h (cumulative daily dose of 1,400 mg) would produce an exposure that would equal or exceed the average free 24-h AUC of 90 mg x h/liter generated by linezolid at 500 mg q12h in 93.8% of human subjects. In conclusion, in our in vitro studies, the QD-administered, pharmacodynamically optimized regimen for linezolid killed drug-susceptible B. anthracis and prevented resistance emergence at lower dosages than q12h regimens. The lower dosage for the pharmacodynamically optimized regimen may decrease drug toxicity. Also, the QD administration schedule may improve patient compliance.
在体外药效学模型中模拟利奈唑胺在人血清中的平均非蛋白结合(游离)药物浓度-时间曲线,我们确定了利奈唑胺预测炭疽芽孢杆菌杀灭及预防耐药的药效学参数。在为期10天的剂量范围研究中,每日一次(QD)给予≥700mg利奈唑胺的平均暴露量可使炭疽芽孢杆菌数量下降>3个对数CFU/ml,且无耐药性选择。每日剂量≤600mg的利奈唑胺会导致耐药性增加。每日两次(q12h)给药时,预防耐药需要每12小时给予≥500mg利奈唑胺。在剂量分割研究中,炭疽芽孢杆菌的杀灭情况可通过时间-浓度曲线下面积(AUC)/最低抑菌浓度(MIC)比值预测。然而,预防耐药与血清药物最高浓度(C(max))/MIC比值相关。蒙特卡洛模拟预测,每日一次给予1100mg利奈唑胺在96.7%的人体受试者中可产生与每日一次给予700mg利奈唑胺产生的平均24小时AUC(78.5mg·h/升)相匹配或超过该值的游离24小时AUC,同时重现该药效学优化方案的浓度-时间曲线形状。然而,每12小时给予700mg利奈唑胺(每日累积剂量1400mg)在93.8%的人体受试者中产生的暴露量将等于或超过每12小时给予500mg利奈唑胺产生的平均游离24小时AUC(90mg·h/升)。总之,在我们的体外研究中,利奈唑胺每日一次给药的药效学优化方案可杀灭药敏性炭疽芽孢杆菌,并在比每12小时给药方案更低的剂量下预防耐药性出现。药效学优化方案的较低剂量可能降低药物毒性。此外,每日一次给药方案可能提高患者的依从性。