Wong Chit-Ming, Lai Hak-Kan, Ou Chun-Quan, Ho Sai-Yin, Chan King-Pan, Thach Thuan-Quoc, Yang Lin, Chau Yuen-Kwan, Lam Tai-Hing, Hedley Anthony Johnson, Peiris Joseph Sriyal Malik
Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
PLoS One. 2008 May 7;3(5):e2108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002108.
Little is known about the effect of physical exercise on influenza-associated mortality.
We collected information about exercise habits and other lifestyles, and socioeconomic and demographic status, the underlying cause of death of 24,656 adults (21% aged 30-64, 79% aged 65 or above) who died in 1998 in Hong Kong, and the weekly proportion of specimens positive for influenza A (H3N1 and H1N1) and B isolations during the same period. We assessed the excess risks (ER) of influenza-associated mortality due to all-natural causes, cardiovascular diseases, or respiratory disease among different levels of exercise: never/seldom (less than once per month), low/moderate (once per month to three times per week), and frequent (four times or more per week) by Poisson regression. We also assessed the differences in ER between exercise groups by case-only logistic regression. For all the mortality outcomes under study in relation to each 10% increase in weekly proportion of specimens positive for influenza A+B, never/seldom exercise (as reference) was associated with 5.8% to 8.5% excess risks (ER) of mortality (P<0.0001), while low/moderate exercise was associated with ER which were 4.2% to 6.4% lower than those of the reference (P<0.001 for all-natural causes; P = 0.001 for cardiovascular; and P = 0.07 for respiratory mortality). Frequent exercise was not different from the reference (change in ER -0.8% to 1.7%, P = 0.30 to 0.73).
When compared with never or seldom exercise, exercising at low to moderate frequency is beneficial with lower influenza-associated mortality.
关于体育锻炼对流感相关死亡率的影响,人们了解甚少。
我们收集了24656名于1998年在香港死亡的成年人(21%年龄在30 - 64岁,79%年龄在65岁及以上)的运动习惯及其他生活方式、社会经济和人口统计学状况、死亡的根本原因,以及同期甲型流感(H3N1和H1N1)和乙型流感分离株阳性标本的每周比例。我们通过泊松回归评估了不同运动水平(从不/很少(每月少于一次)、低/中等(每月一次至每周三次)和频繁(每周四次或更多))下因所有自然原因、心血管疾病或呼吸系统疾病导致的流感相关死亡的超额风险(ER)。我们还通过病例对照逻辑回归评估了运动组之间ER的差异。对于所研究的所有死亡结局,随着甲型和乙型流感阳性标本每周比例每增加10%,从不/很少运动(作为对照)与死亡率超额风险(ER)增加5.8%至8.5%相关(P<0.0001),而低/中等强度运动的ER比对照低4.2%至6.4%(所有自然原因P<0.001;心血管疾病P = 0.001;呼吸系统死亡率P = 0.07)。频繁运动与对照无差异(ER变化 -0.8%至1.7%,P = 0.30至0.73)。
与从不或很少运动相比,低至中等频率的运动有益,可降低流感相关死亡率。