• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用社会困难量表(SDI)对社会困扰进行测量与解读。

Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI).

作者信息

Wright Penny, Marshall Laura, Smith Adam B, Velikova Galina, Selby Peter

机构信息

Psychosocial and Clinical Practice Research Group, Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Section of Oncology and Clinical Research, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jul;44(11):1529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.011
PMID:18486469
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Cancer has a significant social impact. There is a requirement to undertake formal assessment of this in research and clinical practice.

AIM

To establish values of clinically meaningful differences and changes in social distress (SOCD) using the social difficulties inventory (SDI).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients treated with curative intent completed the SDI and the EORTC quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated using anchor and distribution methods.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-eight patients participated. SOCD was elevated at baseline demonstrating the social burden of cancer on patients following diagnosis. Anchor estimates for MIDs were by age groups 3.37 and in comparison to EORTC QLQ-C30 social functioning scale from 0 to 6.27. Using distribution methods: SEM 2.01-4.92 and SD 1.67-3.57.

CONCLUSION

For general guidance, an estimate of 3 (range 0-44) is recommended as a clinically important difference, illustrated by case studies and group comparisons.

摘要

未标注

癌症具有重大的社会影响。在研究和临床实践中需要对此进行正式评估。

目的

使用社会困难量表(SDI)确定具有临床意义的差异值以及社会困扰(SOCD)的变化情况。

方法

接受根治性治疗的新诊断患者在基线、6个月、12个月和24个月时完成SDI和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)。使用锚定法和分布法估计最小重要差异(MIDs)。

结果

188名患者参与。基线时SOCD升高,表明癌症诊断后对患者的社会负担。按年龄组划分的MIDs锚定估计值为3.37,与EORTC QLQ-C30社会功能量表相比为0至6.27。使用分布法:标准误2.01 - 4.92,标准差1.67 - 3.57。

结论

作为一般指导,建议将3(范围0 - 44)的估计值作为具有临床重要意义的差异,通过案例研究和组间比较说明。

相似文献

1
Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI).使用社会困难量表(SDI)对社会困扰进行测量与解读。
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jul;44(11):1529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 May 15.
2
Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)在晚期癌症患者中的最小重要差异
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun;10(2):109-17. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12070. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
3
Minimally important differences for interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 change scores over time: A synthesis across 21 clinical trials involving nine different cancer types.最小有意义变化值在解读 EORTC QLQ-C30 时间变化评分中的作用:跨越涉及 9 种不同癌症类型的 21 项临床试验的综合研究
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jul;188:171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 May 7.
4
Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients.建立基于锚定的 EORTC QLQ-C30 在脑胶质瘤患者中的最小重要差异。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1327-1336. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab037.
5
Minimally important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma - Interpretation guidance derived from two randomized EORTC trials.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30量表在肺癌或恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中的最小重要差异——来自两项EORTC随机试验的解读指南
Lung Cancer. 2022 May;167:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI): development of subscales and scoring guidance for staff.社会困难量表(SDI):员工分量表的开发和评分指南。
Psychooncology. 2011 Jan;20(1):36-43. doi: 10.1002/pon.1705.
7
Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol.基于锚定法确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量测量指标的最小重要差异(MID):一项荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e019117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019117.
8
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Evaluation of Minimal Important Difference and Responder Definition in the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 Module for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Surgically Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.评估 EORTC QLQ-PAN26 模块中用于评估接受手术切除胰腺腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的最小重要差异和应答者定义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7545-7554. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09816-z. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
10
Measuring social difficulties in routine patient-centred assessment: a Rasch analysis of the social difficulties inventory.在以患者为中心的常规评估中衡量社会困难:社会困难量表的拉施分析
Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):823-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9181-9. Epub 2007 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of cancer-related fatigue on the social, vocational and healthcare-related dimensions of cancer survivorship.癌症相关疲劳与癌症幸存者在社会、职业和医疗保健相关方面的关联。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01451-9. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.分布和锚定基方法在肿瘤患者报告结局问卷中的最小重要差异的确定:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 11;16(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1055-z.
3
Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients.
癌症患者患者角色和责任量表的编制及验证。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2923-2934. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1940-2. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Health-related quality of life after treatment for bladder cancer in England.英格兰膀胱癌治疗后的健康相关生活质量。
Br J Cancer. 2018 May;118(11):1518-1528. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0084-z. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients' everyday lives: a systematic review.患者报告的癌症对患者日常生活影响的结局指标:一项系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Apr;11(2):211-232. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice.对临床医生进行关于如何在常规临床实践中使用患者报告结局测量的培训。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1707-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0903-5. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
7
Assessing the social impact of cancer: a review of available tools.评估癌症的社会影响:现有工具的综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Oct;20(10):2249-57. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1545-1. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
8
Score equivalence of electronic and paper versions of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21): a randomised crossover trial in cancer patients.社会困难量表(SDI-21)电子版本和纸质版本的评分等效性:癌症患者中一项随机交叉试验。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1435-40. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0242-3. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
Measurement invariance of the 16-item social distress scale.16 项社交痛苦量表的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2011 May;20(4):507-11. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9782-6. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
10
Translation of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21) into three South Asian languages and preliminary evaluation of SDI-21(Urdu).将社会困难量表(SDI-21)翻译成三种南亚语言,并初步评估 SDI-21(乌尔都语)。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Apr;20(3):431-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9756-8. Epub 2010 Oct 15.