Hochgräfe Falko, Wolf Carmen, Fuchs Stephan, Liebeke Manuel, Lalk Michael, Engelmann Susanne, Hecker Michael
Institut für Mikrobiologie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
J Bacteriol. 2008 Jul;190(14):4997-5008. doi: 10.1128/JB.01846-07. Epub 2008 May 16.
The nonpathogenic Bacillus subtilis and the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus are gram-positive model organisms that have to cope with the radical nitric oxide (NO) generated by nitrite reductases of denitrifying bacteria and by the inducible NO synthases of immune cells of the host, respectively. The response of both microorganisms to NO was analyzed by using a two-dimensional gel approach. Metabolic labeling of the proteins revealed major changes in the synthesis pattern of cytosolic proteins after the addition of the NO donor MAHMA NONOate. Whereas B. subtilis induced several oxidative stress-responsive regulons controlled by Fur, PerR, OhrR, and Spx, as well as the general stress response controlled by the alternative sigma factor SigB, the more resistant S. aureus showed an increased synthesis rate of proteins involved in anaerobic metabolism. These data were confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance analyses indicating that NO causes a drastically higher increase in the formation of lactate and butanediol in S. aureus than in B. subtilis. Monitoring the intracellular protein thiol state, we observed no increase in reversible or irreversible protein thiol modifications after NO stress in either organism. Obviously, NO itself does not cause general protein thiol oxidations. In contrast, exposure of cells to NO prior to peroxide stress diminished the irreversible thiol oxidation caused by hydrogen peroxide.
非致病性枯草芽孢杆菌和致病性金黄色葡萄球菌都是革兰氏阳性模式生物,它们分别必须应对反硝化细菌的亚硝酸还原酶和宿主免疫细胞的诱导型一氧化氮合酶产生的活性一氧化氮(NO)。通过二维凝胶方法分析了这两种微生物对NO的反应。蛋白质的代谢标记显示,添加NO供体MAHMA NONOate后,胞质蛋白的合成模式发生了重大变化。枯草芽孢杆菌诱导了由Fur、PerR、OhrR和Spx控制的几种氧化应激反应调节子,以及由替代sigma因子SigB控制的一般应激反应,而更具抗性的金黄色葡萄球菌显示参与厌氧代谢的蛋白质合成速率增加。核磁共振分析证实了这些数据,表明NO导致金黄色葡萄球菌中乳酸和丁二醇的形成比枯草芽孢杆菌中急剧增加。监测细胞内蛋白质硫醇状态,我们发现在任何一种生物体中,NO应激后可逆或不可逆的蛋白质硫醇修饰均未增加。显然,NO本身不会引起一般的蛋白质硫醇氧化。相反,在过氧化物应激之前将细胞暴露于NO可减少过氧化氢引起的不可逆硫醇氧化。