Kosmopoulos Victor, Stafylas Kosmas, McManus John, Schizas Constantin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, CBH-313, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1066-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0686-x. Epub 2008 May 22.
Total disc replacement (TDR) clinical success has been reported to be related to the residual motion of the operated level. Thus, accurate measurement of TDR range of motion (ROM) is of utmost importance. One commonly used tool in measuring ROM is the Oxford Cobbometer. Little is known however on its accuracy (precision and bias) in measuring TDR angles. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Cobbometer to accurately measure radiographic TDR angles. An anatomically accurate synthetic L4-L5 motion segment was instrumented with a CHARITE artificial disc. The TDR angle and anatomical position between L4 and L5 was fixed to prohibit motion while the motion segment was radiographically imaged in various degrees of rotation and elevation, representing a sample of possible patient placement positions. An experienced observer made ten readings of the TDR angle using the Cobbometer at each different position. The Cobbometer readings were analyzed to determine measurement accuracy at each position. Furthermore, analysis of variance was used to study rotation and elevation of the motion segment as treatment factors. Cobbometer TDR angle measurements were most accurate (highest precision and lowest bias) at the centered position (95.5%), which placed the TDR directly inline with the x-ray beam source without any rotation. In contrast, the lowest accuracy (75.2%) was observed in the most rotated and off-centered view. A difference as high as 4 degrees between readings at any individual position, and as high as 6 degrees between all the positions was observed. Furthermore, the Cobbometer was unable to detect the expected trend in TDR angle projection with changing position. Although the Cobbometer has been reported to be reliable in different clinical applications, it lacks the needed accuracy to measure TDR angles and ROM. More accurate ROM measurement methods need to be developed to help surgeons and researchers assess radiological success of TDRs.
据报道,全椎间盘置换术(TDR)的临床成功与手术节段的残余活动度有关。因此,准确测量TDR的活动范围(ROM)至关重要。测量ROM常用的工具之一是牛津 Cobb 角测量仪。然而,对于其测量TDR角度的准确性(精度和偏差)却知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估 Cobb 角测量仪准确测量TDR影像学角度的能力。使用 CHARITE 人工椎间盘对具有解剖学准确性的合成 L4-L5 运动节段进行器械植入。固定 L4 和 L5 之间的TDR角度和解剖位置以禁止活动,同时在不同程度的旋转和抬高状态下对运动节段进行影像学成像,代表可能的患者放置位置样本。一位经验丰富的观察者在每个不同位置使用 Cobb 角测量仪对TDR角度进行十次读数。分析 Cobb 角测量仪的读数以确定每个位置的测量准确性。此外,使用方差分析研究运动节段的旋转和抬高作为治疗因素。Cobb 角测量仪对TDR角度的测量在中心位置最准确(精度最高且偏差最低)(95.5%),该位置使TDR直接与X射线束源对齐且无任何旋转。相比之下,在旋转最多且偏离中心的视图中观察到最低的准确性(75.2%)。在任何单个位置读数之间的差异高达4度,在所有位置之间的差异高达6度。此外,Cobb 角测量仪无法检测到TDR角度投影随位置变化的预期趋势。尽管据报道 Cobb 角测量仪在不同的临床应用中是可靠的,但它缺乏测量TDR角度和ROM所需的准确性。需要开发更准确的ROM测量方法,以帮助外科医生和研究人员评估TDR的放射学成功率。