Nair Kalpana M, Dolovich Lisa, Brazil Kevin, Raina Parminder
Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St, Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 105 Main Street East, Hamilton, ON L8N 1G6, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 May 23;8:110. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-110.
Interdisciplinary research has been promoted as an optimal research paradigm in the health sciences, yet little is known about how researchers experience interdisciplinarity in practice. This study sought to determine how interdisciplinary research was conceptualized and operationalized from the researcher's perspective and to better understand how best to facilitate interdisciplinary research success.
Key informant interviews were conducted with health researchers with expertise or experience in conducting interdisciplinary research. Interviews were completed either in person or over the telephone using a semi-structured interview guide. Data collection occurred simultaneously with data analysis so that emerging themes could be explored in subsequent interviews. A content analysis approach was used.
Nineteen researchers took part in this study. Interdisciplinary research was conceptualized disparately between participants, and there was modest attention towards operationalization of interdisciplinary research. There was one overriding theme, "It's all about relationships", that emerged from the data. Within this theme, there were four related subthemes: 1) Involvement in interdisciplinary research; 2) Why do I do interdisciplinary research?; 3) Managing and fostering interdisciplinary relationships; and 4) The prickly side to interdisciplinary research. Together, these themes suggest that the choice to conduct interdisciplinary research, though often driven by the research question, is highly influenced by interpersonal and relationship-related factors. In addition, researchers preferred to engage in interdisciplinary research with those that they had already established relationships and where their role in the research process was clearly articulated. A focus on relationship building was seen as a strong facilitator of interdisciplinary success.
Many health researchers experienced mixed reactions towards their involvement in interdisciplinary research. A well thought-out rationale for interdisciplinary research, and strategies to utilize the contribution of each researcher involved were seen as facilitators towards maximizing the benefits that could be derived from interdisciplinary research.
跨学科研究已被推崇为健康科学领域的一种最佳研究范式,但对于研究人员在实践中如何体验跨学科性却知之甚少。本研究旨在确定从研究人员的角度来看,跨学科研究是如何被概念化和实施的,并更好地理解如何最好地促进跨学科研究的成功。
对在进行跨学科研究方面具有专业知识或经验的健康研究人员进行了关键信息人访谈。访谈通过面对面或电话方式进行,使用半结构化访谈指南。数据收集与数据分析同时进行,以便在后续访谈中探讨新出现的主题。采用了内容分析方法。
19名研究人员参与了本研究。参与者对跨学科研究的概念化存在差异,对跨学科研究的实施关注程度一般。数据中出现了一个首要主题,即“一切都关乎关系”。在这个主题下,有四个相关的子主题:1)参与跨学科研究;2)我为何进行跨学科研究?;3)管理和培养跨学科关系;4)跨学科研究的棘手之处。这些主题共同表明,进行跨学科研究的选择虽然通常由研究问题驱动,但也受到人际和关系相关因素的高度影响。此外,研究人员更倾向于与他们已经建立关系且在研究过程中的角色明确的人开展跨学科研究。关注关系建设被视为跨学科成功的有力促进因素。
许多健康研究人员对参与跨学科研究有不同的反应。一个经过深思熟虑的跨学科研究基本原理,以及利用每位参与研究人员贡献的策略,被视为有助于最大化从跨学科研究中获得的益处。