Marquez Erika, Haboush-Deloye Amanda, Lawrence Elizabeth, Ayele Selam, Coughenour Courtney, Doyle Nora, Dizon Wynona, Perez Rodriguez Lizbeth, Bombara Chloe
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Nevada Institute for Children's Research and Policy, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Health Equity. 2025 Mar 21;9(1):175-182. doi: 10.1089/heq.2024.0112. eCollection 2025.
Prior research indicates that enrolling underrepresented populations in clinical research is challenging. Although research has identified some barriers to participation and strategies to overcome them, studies have made little progress in being inclusive and representative. There remains a great need for including racial/ethnic minorities, low-income families, and pregnant women in research. The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of enrollment strategies used in our study to understand the feasibility of building a maternal cohort and better understand the relationship between environmental and social impacts on maternal exposure and child outcomes.
Working across multiple academic units, our team implemented equity-focused team science strategies to recruit diverse populations into a research study. The phases included development, conceptualization, implementation, and translation.
Our interdisciplinary team study used intentionality and commitment to deploy effective strategies including clearly defining the problem, selecting the correct team members to leverage expertise, clearly defining the study, establishing roles and responsibilities, representation, and clear and constant communication. A total of 100 pregnant women enrolled in our study using a team science interdisciplinary model.
Building interdisciplinary teams can help us understand complex problems, increase innovation, and develop effective solutions in policy and practice. More specifically, interdisciplinary teams can advance our ability to recruit diverse populations into research. Future studies should consider how to harness the strengths of the different research team members to achieve more inclusive participation.
This work has the potential to improve representation in research findings, enhance understanding of health disparities, and promote inclusive research practices.
先前的研究表明,让代表性不足的人群参与临床研究具有挑战性。尽管研究已经确定了一些参与障碍以及克服这些障碍的策略,但在实现包容性和代表性方面进展甚微。在研究中纳入种族/族裔少数群体、低收入家庭和孕妇的需求仍然很大。本文的目的是描述我们研究中所采用的招募策略的实施情况,以了解建立一个孕产妇队列的可行性,并更好地理解环境和社会对孕产妇暴露及儿童结局的影响之间的关系。
我们的团队跨多个学术单位开展工作,实施了以公平为重点的团队科学策略,以招募不同人群参与一项研究。这些阶段包括开发、概念化、实施和转化。
我们的跨学科团队研究通过有意为之和坚定决心来部署有效策略,包括明确界定问题、挑选合适的团队成员以利用其专业知识、明确界定研究、确立角色和职责、代表性以及清晰持续的沟通。共有100名孕妇通过团队科学跨学科模式参与了我们的研究。
组建跨学科团队有助于我们理解复杂问题、增加创新,并在政策和实践中制定有效的解决方案。更具体地说,跨学科团队可以提升我们招募不同人群参与研究的能力。未来的研究应考虑如何利用不同研究团队成员的优势,以实现更具包容性的参与。
这项工作有可能改善研究结果中的代表性,增进对健康差距的理解,并促进包容性的研究实践。