Paulmann Silke, Pell Marc D, Kotz Sonja A
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, PO Box 500 355, Leipzig, Germany.
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 27;1217:171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.032. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
The basal ganglia (BG) have been functionally linked to emotional processing [Pell, M.D., Leonard, C.L., 2003. Processing emotional tone form speech in Parkinson's Disease: a role for the basal ganglia. Cogn. Affec. Behav. Neurosci. 3, 275-288; Pell, M.D., 2006. Cerebral mechanisms for understanding emotional prosody in speech. Brain Lang. 97 (2), 221-234]. However, few studies have tried to specify the precise role of the BG during emotional prosodic processing. Therefore, the current study examined deviance detection in healthy listeners and patients with left focal BG lesions during implicit emotional prosodic processing in an event-related brain potential (ERP)-experiment. In order to compare these ERP responses with explicit judgments of emotional prosody, the same participants were tested in a follow-up recognition task. As previously reported [Kotz, S.A., Paulmann, S., 2007. When emotional prosody and semantics dance cheek to cheek: ERP evidence. Brain Res. 1151, 107-118; Paulmann, S. & Kotz, S.A., 2008. An ERP investigation on the temporal dynamics of emotional prosody and emotional semantics in pseudo- and lexical sentence context. Brain Lang. 105, 59-69], deviance of prosodic expectancy elicits a right lateralized positive ERP component in healthy listeners. Here we report a similar positive ERP correlate in BG-patients and healthy controls. In contrast, BG-patients are significantly impaired in explicit recognition of emotional prosody when compared to healthy controls. The current data serve as first evidence that focal lesions in left BG do not necessarily affect implicit emotional prosodic processing but evaluative emotional prosodic processes as demonstrated in the recognition task. The results suggest that the BG may not play a mandatory role in implicit emotional prosodic processing. Rather, executive processes underlying the recognition task may be dysfunctional during emotional prosodic processing.
基底神经节(BG)在功能上与情绪加工相关联[佩尔,医学博士,伦纳德,C.L.,2003年。帕金森病中处理语音的情感语调:基底神经节的作用。认知、情感与行为神经科学。3,275 - 288;佩尔,医学博士,2006年。理解语音中情感韵律的脑机制。大脑与语言。97(2),221 - 234]。然而,很少有研究试图明确基底神经节在情感韵律加工过程中的精确作用。因此,本研究在一项事件相关脑电位(ERP)实验中,检测了健康受试者和左侧局灶性基底神经节病变患者在隐性情感韵律加工过程中的偏差检测情况。为了将这些ERP反应与对情感韵律的明确判断进行比较,对相同的受试者进行了后续的识别任务测试。如先前报道[科茨,S.A.,保尔曼,S.,2007年。当情感韵律和语义亲密共舞时:ERP证据。脑研究。1151,107 - 118;保尔曼,S.和科茨,S.A.,2008年。ERP对伪句和词汇句语境中情感韵律和情感语义的时间动态的研究。大脑与语言。105,59 - 69],韵律预期偏差在健康受试者中会引发右侧化的正向ERP成分。在此我们报告基底神经节病变患者和健康对照者中存在类似的正向ERP关联。相比之下,与健康对照者相比,基底神经节病变患者在情感韵律的明确识别方面明显受损。当前数据首次证明,左侧基底神经节的局灶性病变不一定会影响隐性情感韵律加工,但如识别任务中所示,会影响评价性情感韵律加工过程。结果表明,基底神经节在隐性情感韵律加工中可能不发挥强制性作用。相反,识别任务背后的执行过程在情感韵律加工过程中可能功能失调。