Morgan Scott C, Waldron Tricia S, Eapen Libni, Mayhew Linda A, Winquist Eric, Lukka Himu
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jul;88(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.04.013. Epub 2008 May 22.
Results following radical prostatectomy (RP) are suboptimal in patients found to have cancer extending beyond the prostatic capsule (pT3) or present at the resection margins (R1). The optimal postoperative management of such patients is undefined. Therapeutic alternatives include adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or active surveillance.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review if they compared adjuvant RT in the immediate period after RP to active surveillance - with therapies held in reserve for salvage - in prostate cancer patients with pT3 or R1 disease or both. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival.
Three RCTs representing 1,743 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria. Two trials reported data on overall survival; a meta-analysis of the data showed no significant improvement associated with adjuvant RT (hazard ratio=0.91, 95% CI 0.67-1.22, p=0.52). All trials reported data on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). On meta-analysis, adjuvant RT significantly improved bPFS (hazard ratio=0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.56, p<0.00001). One trial provided comparative graded toxicity data; there were no significant differences between arms in severe (grade 3) gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity at five years.
To date, adjuvant RT has not been shown to improve overall survival compared with active surveillance. Longer follow-up from completed RCTs is required to accurately assess this outcome. Adjuvant RT does, however, significantly improve bPFS and is not associated with excess severe late toxicity.
对于那些被发现癌症已超出前列腺包膜(pT3)或出现在手术切缘(R1)的患者,根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的效果并不理想。此类患者的最佳术后管理尚不明确。治疗选择包括辅助放疗(RT)或主动监测。
如果随机对照试验(RCT)比较了RP术后即刻进行的辅助RT与主动监测(将治疗措施留作挽救性治疗备用),纳入的患者为患有pT⁃3或R1疾病或两者皆有的前列腺癌患者,则该RCT有资格纳入本系统评价。感兴趣的主要结局是总生存期。
三项代表1743例患者的RCT符合纳入标准。两项试验报告了总生存期数据;对这些数据进行的荟萃分析显示,辅助RT未带来显著改善(风险比=0.91,95%CI 0.67-1.22,p=0.52)。所有试验均报告了无生化进展生存期(bPFS)数据。经荟萃分析,辅助RT显著改善了bPFS(风险比=0.47,95%CI 0.40-0.56,p<0.00001)。一项试验提供了比较性的分级毒性数据;两组在5年时严重(3级)胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统毒性方面无显著差异。
迄今为止,与主动监测相比,辅助RT尚未显示能改善总生存期。需要对已完成的RCT进行更长时间的随访,以准确评估这一结局。然而,辅助RT确实能显著改善bPFS,且与过多的严重晚期毒性无关。