Liess Anna, Simon Wendy, Yutsis Maya, Owen Jason E, Piemme Karen Altree, Golant Mitch, Giese-Davis Janine
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;76(3):517-23. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.3.517.
Accurately detecting emotional expression in women with primary breast cancer participating in support groups may be important for therapists and researchers. In 2 small studies (N = 20 and N = 16), the authors examined whether video coding, human text coding, and automated text analysis provided consistent estimates of the level of emotional expression. In Study 1, the authors compared coding from videotapes and text transcripts of face-to-face groups. In Study 2, the authors examined transcripts of online synchronous groups. The authors found that human text coding significantly overestimated Positive Affect and underestimated Defensive/Hostile Affect compared with video coding. They found correlations were low for Positive Affect but moderate for negative affect between Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) and video coding. The implications of utilizing text-only detection of emotion are discussed.
准确检测参加支持小组的原发性乳腺癌女性的情绪表达,对治疗师和研究人员而言可能很重要。在两项小型研究(N = 20和N = 16)中,作者检验了视频编码、人工文本编码和自动文本分析是否能对情绪表达水平提供一致的估计。在研究1中,作者比较了面对面小组的录像带编码和文字记录编码。在研究2中,作者检验了在线同步小组的文字记录。作者发现,与视频编码相比,人工文本编码显著高估了积极情绪,低估了防御性/敌对情绪。他们发现,语言查询词频统计(LIWC)与视频编码之间,积极情绪的相关性较低,消极情绪的相关性中等。文中讨论了仅利用文本检测情绪的意义。