Campolattaro Matthew M, Schnitker Kathleen M, Freeman John H
University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Learn Behav. 2008 May;36(2):159-65. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.2.159.
Three experiments examined inhibitory learning in rats, using Pavlovian and differential inhibitory eyeblink conditioning procedures. Experiment 1 was designed to compare summation and retardation effects following Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (A+/XA-) or differential inhibition (A+/X-) training using auditory and visual conditioned stimuli (CSs). After ten 100-trial sessions of training, both Pavlovian conditioned inhibition and differential inhibition produced a retardation effect. However, a summation effect was obtained only for rats given Pavlovian conditioned inhibition training. Experiment 2 showed that increasing differential inhibition training to twenty 100-trial sessions produced summation and retardation effects. In Experiment 3, rats were trained with either ten or twenty 100-trial sessions of intramodal inhibitory training with two tone CSs (2 kHz vs. 8 kHz). Summation and retardation effects were obtained after only 20 sessions of differential conditioning. The findings indicate that extensive training is needed to establish conditioned inhibition with intermodal or intramodal differential conditioning.
三项实验使用巴甫洛夫条件抑制和差异抑制眨眼条件反射程序研究了大鼠的抑制性学习。实验1旨在比较使用听觉和视觉条件刺激(CS)进行巴甫洛夫条件抑制(A+/XA-)或差异抑制(A+/X-)训练后的总和效应与延迟效应。经过十次每次100次试验的训练后,巴甫洛夫条件抑制和差异抑制均产生了延迟效应。然而,仅对接受巴甫洛夫条件抑制训练的大鼠获得了总和效应。实验2表明,将差异抑制训练增加到二十次每次100次试验产生了总和效应和延迟效应。在实验3中,大鼠接受了十次或二十次每次100次试验的使用两种音调CS(2千赫对8千赫)的模式内抑制训练。仅在20次差异条件反射后就获得了总和效应和延迟效应。研究结果表明,需要进行广泛的训练才能通过模式间或模式内差异条件反射建立条件抑制。