Smolander J, Ilmarinen R, Korhonen O
Institute of Occupational Health, Laajaniityntie, Vantaa, Finland.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(1):39-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00406196.
The ISO 7243 heat stress standard based on the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) heat stress index and the analytical standard proposal ISO/DIS 7933 were evaluated in eight physically trained and eight untrained, unacclimated men during prolonged light exercise carried out while wearing industrial work clothing. The exercise tests were done in a thermoneutral (20 degrees C/40%), a warm humid (30 degrees C/80% humidity), and a hot dry (40 degrees C/20% humidity) environment. Both of the standards were effective in predicting the excessive thermal strain observed in the dry and humid heat (WBGT, 28 degrees C). In dry heat, neither of the standards took into account the higher sweating capacities of the physically trained men. The large inter-individual variability in the physiological responses to heat stress questioned the calculations of definite allowable exposure times (ISO/DIS 7933).
在八名经过体能训练的男性和八名未经训练、未适应环境的男性穿着工业工作服进行长时间轻度运动期间,对基于湿球黑球温度(WBGT)热应激指数的ISO 7243热应激标准和分析标准提案ISO/DIS 7933进行了评估。运动测试在热中性(20摄氏度/40%)、温暖潮湿(30摄氏度/80%湿度)和炎热干燥(40摄氏度/20%湿度)环境中进行。这两个标准在预测干热和湿热(WBGT,28摄氏度)中观察到的过度热应变方面都是有效的。在干热环境中,这两个标准都没有考虑到体能训练男性较高的出汗能力。热应激生理反应中个体间的巨大差异对确定允许暴露时间的计算(ISO/DIS 7933)提出了质疑。