Lee B B, Simpson J M, King M T, Haran M J, Marial O
Spinal Medicine Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Spinal Cord. 2009 Jan;47(1):50-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.65. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of a modified SF-36 within a spinal cord-injured (SCI) population.
SF-36 scores collected at baseline and on completion of a randomized controlled trial in 305 patients with SCI and neuropathic bladder.
New South Wales, Australia.
Subjects were administered the standard SF-36 plus three additional questions, in which 'walk' was replaced with 'wheel' for three of the physical function (PF) questions. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing participants with paraplegia and tetraplegia using the effect size (ES). Responsiveness was assessed in the subset of patients who developed a urinary tract infection (UTI) during the trial using the standardized response mean (SRM).
Compared with the standard SF-36, the SF-36 walk-wheel modification (SF-36ww) increased the mean PF score from 18 to 39 (P<0.001) and the physical composite score from 33 to 37 (P<0.001). Discriminant validity was similar for both versions (PF paraplegia/tetraplegia: ES 1.09(SF-36) vs 1.08(SF-36ww), n=305). Among 138 SCI patients who developed a UTI, the SF-36ww almost doubled PF responsiveness for all neurological levels (SRM increased from 0.36 to 0.68), more so in tetraplegic (SRM, 0.11 vs 0.58; n=77) than paraplegic groups (SRM, 0.77 vs 0.86; n=61).
The SF-36ww is a simple, pragmatic modification of the SF-36 PF items, which addresses some problems of content validity and floor effect for SCI subjects and greatly improves responsiveness, particularly for those with tetraplegia. Because it comprises a simple addition to the standard SF-36, external comparisons are preserved.
评估改良版SF-36在脊髓损伤(SCI)人群中的有效性和反应性。
收集了305例SCI合并神经性膀胱患者在基线时和随机对照试验结束时的SF-36评分。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州。
受试者接受标准的SF-36问卷并额外回答三个问题,其中在三个身体功能(PF)问题中,将“行走”替换为“轮椅活动”。通过使用效应量(ES)比较截瘫和四肢瘫参与者来确定区分效度。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)对试验期间发生尿路感染(UTI)的患者亚组进行反应性评估。
与标准SF-36相比,SF-36行走-轮椅活动改良版(SF-36ww)使平均PF评分从18分提高到39分(P<0.001),身体综合评分从33分提高到37分(P<0.001)。两个版本的区分效度相似(PF截瘫/四肢瘫:ES 1.09(SF-36)对1.08(SF-36ww),n = 305)。在138例发生UTI的SCI患者中,SF-36ww几乎使所有神经水平的PF反应性提高了一倍(SRM从0.36增加到0.68),四肢瘫患者(SRM,0.11对0.58;n = 77)比截瘫组(SRM,0.77对0.86;n = 61)提高得更多。
SF-36ww是对SF-36 PF项目的一种简单、实用的改良,解决了SCI受试者内容效度和地板效应的一些问题,并大大提高了反应性,特别是对于四肢瘫患者。由于它只是在标准SF-36基础上简单增加内容,因此保留了外部比较的可行性。