Maki Pauline M, Drogos Lauren L, Rubin Leah H, Banuvar Suzanne, Shulman Lee P, Geller Stacie E
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Menopause. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):848-56. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31816d815e.
To test the hypothesis that hot flashes specifically relate to verbal memory performance by examining the relationship between objective hot flashes and cognitive test performance in women with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms.
In an observational study, 29 midlife women (mean age, 53 y) with moderate to severe hot flashes provided measures of objective hot flashes with an ambulatory hot flash monitor, subjective hot flashes with a diary and questionnaire, and objective measures of verbal memory and other cognitive functions with standardized neuropsychological tests.
The mean number of objective hot flashes was 19.5 per day (range, 6 to 35), including 15.3 (range, 6 to 35) during waking hours and 4.2 (range, 0 to 9) during sleep. The mean sensitivity (ie, subjective detection of objectively measured hot flashes) was 60%. Regression analyses revealed that total number of objective hot flashes, sleep duration, and verbal knowledge were significant predictors of delayed verbal memory. Verbal fluency correlated positively with objective daytime hot flashes. Hot flashes did not predict performance on any of the other secondary cognitive measures (ie, attention, working memory, visual memory), although poor sleep predicted worse performance on several outcome measures.
Highly symptomatic women underreport the number of objective hot flashes that they experience by 43%. Verbal memory performance relates significantly to the objective number of hot flashes women experience but not to the number of hot flashes that they report. These findings suggest that physiological factors related to hot flashes, rather than psychological factors, predict poorer verbal memory function.
通过研究中度至重度血管舒缩症状女性的客观潮热与认知测试表现之间的关系,来验证潮热与言语记忆表现存在特定关联这一假设。
在一项观察性研究中,29名患有中度至重度潮热的中年女性(平均年龄53岁)使用动态潮热监测仪提供客观潮热测量数据,通过日记和问卷提供主观潮热数据,并通过标准化神经心理学测试提供言语记忆和其他认知功能的客观测量数据。
客观潮热的平均数量为每天19.5次(范围为6至35次),其中清醒时为15.3次(范围为6至35次),睡眠时为4.2次(范围为0至9次)。平均敏感度(即对客观测量潮热的主观察觉)为60%。回归分析显示,客观潮热总数、睡眠时间和言语知识是延迟言语记忆的显著预测因素。言语流畅性与白天客观潮热呈正相关。潮热并未预测任何其他次要认知测量指标(即注意力、工作记忆、视觉记忆)的表现,尽管睡眠不佳预测了多项结果指标的较差表现。
症状严重的女性少报了她们所经历的客观潮热次数的43%。言语记忆表现与女性经历的客观潮热次数显著相关,但与她们报告的潮热次数无关。这些发现表明,与潮热相关的生理因素而非心理因素预测了较差的言语记忆功能。