• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部分类的首选水平取决于可辨别性。

The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability.

作者信息

D'Lauro Christopher, Tanaka James W, Curran Tim

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0345, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):623-9. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.623.

DOI:10.3758/pbr.15.3.623
PMID:18567265
Abstract

People usually categorize objects more quickly at the basic level (e.g., "dog") than at the subordinate (e.g., "collie") or superordinate (e.g., "animal") levels. Notable exceptions to this rule include objects of expertise, faces, or atypical objects (e.g., "penguin," "poodle"), all of which show faster than normal subordinate-level categorization. We hypothesize that the subordinate-level reaction time advantage for faces is influenced by their discriminability relative to other faces in the stimulus set. First, we replicated the subordinate-level advantage for faces (Experiment 1) and then showed that a basic-level advantage for faces can be elicited by increasing the perceptual similarity of the face stimuli, making discrimination more difficult (Experiment 2). Finally, we repeated both effects within subjects, showing that individual faces were slower to be categorized in the context of similar faces and more quickly categorized among diverse faces (Experiment 3).

摘要

人们通常在基本层次(例如“狗”)对物体进行分类的速度比在下属层次(例如“柯利牧羊犬”)或上级层次(例如“动物”)更快。这条规则的显著例外包括专业对象、面孔或非典型对象(例如“企鹅”“贵宾犬”),所有这些对象在下属层次的分类速度都比正常情况快。我们假设面孔在下属层次的反应时间优势受其与刺激集中其他面孔的可辨别性影响。首先,我们复制了面孔在下属层次的优势(实验1),然后表明通过增加面孔刺激的感知相似性,使辨别更加困难,可以引发面孔在基本层次的优势(实验2)。最后,我们在个体内部重复了这两种效应,表明在相似面孔的背景下,个体对面孔进行分类的速度较慢,而在不同面孔中分类速度更快(实验3)。

相似文献

1
The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability.面部分类的首选水平取决于可辨别性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):623-9. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.623.
2
Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.熟悉度对面部和物体分类水平的影响。
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
3
Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.所有类型的专业知识都是平等的吗?汽车专家在对汽车和人脸进行下属分类时使用不同的空间频率尺度。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067024. Print 2013.
4
The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise.人脸识别的切入点:面部专业技能的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):534-43. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.534.
5
Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception.中等复杂度片段的基本层次分类揭示了视觉感知中专业知识的自上而下效应。
J Vis. 2011 Jul 28;11(8):18. doi: 10.1167/11.8.18.
6
Association and dissociation between detection and discrimination of objects of expertise: Evidence from visual search.专业领域物体检测与辨别之间的关联与分离:来自视觉搜索的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):391-406. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0562-6.
7
The relationship between visual search and categorization of own- and other-age faces.自身年龄和他人年龄面孔的视觉搜索与分类之间的关系。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Nov;109(4):736-757. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12297. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
The characterization of actions at the superordinate, basic and subordinate level.动作在超总、基本和从属水平上的特征化。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1871-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01624-0. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
9
Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage.物体分类:基本水平优势的反转与解释
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):451-69. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.451.
10
Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies.刺激类型、分类水平和空间频率利用:对感知分类层次结构的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1264-73. doi: 10.1037/a0013621.

引用本文的文献

1
Domain-general and domain-specific neural changes underlying visual expertise.视觉专长的领域一般性和领域特殊性神经变化。
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:80-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
Explaining the Timing of Natural Scene Understanding with a Computational Model of Perceptual Categorization.用感知分类计算模型解释自然场景理解的时机
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 3;11(9):e1004456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004456. eCollection 2015 Sep.
3
Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.

本文引用的文献

1
Typicality effects in face and object perception: further evidence for the attractor field model.面部与物体感知中的典型性效应:吸引子场模型的进一步证据
Percept Psychophys. 2007 May;69(4):619-27. doi: 10.3758/bf03193919.
2
Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is.视觉识别:一旦你知道它在那里,你就知道它是什么。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):152-60. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00796.x.
3
Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?对于倒置的面孔,整体加工能够被习得吗?
所有类型的专业知识都是平等的吗?汽车专家在对汽车和人脸进行下属分类时使用不同的空间频率尺度。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067024. Print 2013.
4
The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.特征和构型加工在面孔种族分类中的作用。
Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
5
The timing of visual object categorization.视觉物体分类的时机。
Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 15;2:165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00165. eCollection 2011.
6
Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies.刺激类型、分类水平和空间频率利用:对感知分类层次结构的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1264-73. doi: 10.1037/a0013621.
7
Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.熟悉度对面部和物体分类水平的影响。
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
8
Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age.基于种族、性别和年龄对面孔进行自我种族和其他种族分类。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1093-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1093.
Cognition. 2003 May;88(1):79-107. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00020-9.
4
The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise.人脸识别的切入点:面部专业技能的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):534-43. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.534.
5
A neural basis for expert object recognition.专家物体识别的神经基础。
Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):43-7. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00308.
6
Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition.成为一名“greeble”专家:探索人脸识别机制。
Vision Res. 1997 Jun;37(12):1673-82. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00286-6.
7
An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.一种基于范例的快速分类随机游走模型。
Psychol Rev. 1997 Apr;104(2):266-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.266.
8
Pictures and names: making the connection.图片与名称:建立联系。
Cogn Psychol. 1984 Apr;16(2):243-75. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(84)90009-4.
9
Typicality and familiarity of faces.
Mem Cognit. 1984 May;12(3):219-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03197669.
10
Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage.物体识别中的类别区分:基本类别优势的典型性限制
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Jan;11(1):70-84. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.1.70.