• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

熟悉度对面部和物体分类水平的影响。

Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.

作者信息

Anaki David, Bentin Shlomo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.

出版信息

Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002
PMID:19217085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2800925/
Abstract

It is well established that faces, in contrast to objects, are categorized as fast or faster at the individual level (e.g., Bill Clinton) than at the basic-level (e.g., human face). This subordinate-shift from basic-level categorization has been considered an outcome of visual expertise with processing faces. However, in the present study we found that, similar to familiar faces, categorization of individually-known familiar towers is also faster at the individual level than at the basic-level in naïve participants. In addition, category-verification of familiar stimuli, at basic and superordinate levels, was slower and less accurate compared to unfamiliar stimuli. Thus, the existence of detailed semantic information, regardless of expertise, can induce a shift in the default level of object categorization from basic to individual level. Moreover, the individually-specific knowledge is not only more easily-retrieved from memory but it might also interfere with accessing more general category information.

摘要

与物体相比,人们早已确定,面孔在个体层面(例如比尔·克林顿)的分类速度比在基本层面(例如人脸)更快。这种从基本层面分类的下属转移被认为是处理面孔的视觉专业知识的结果。然而,在本研究中,我们发现,与熟悉的面孔类似,在没有经验的参与者中,对个体熟知的熟悉塔楼的分类在个体层面也比在基本层面更快。此外,与不熟悉的刺激相比,熟悉刺激在基本和上级层面的类别验证更慢且准确性更低。因此,无论专业知识如何,详细语义信息的存在都可以导致物体分类的默认水平从基本层面转移到个体层面。此外,个体特定的知识不仅更容易从记忆中检索出来,而且还可能干扰获取更一般的类别信息。

相似文献

1
Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.熟悉度对面部和物体分类水平的影响。
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
2
Cognitive and anatomical underpinnings of the conceptual knowledge for common objects and familiar people: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.常见物体和熟悉人物的概念知识的认知和解剖基础:一项重复经颅磁刺激研究。
PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e64596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064596. Print 2013.
3
Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.所有类型的专业知识都是平等的吗?汽车专家在对汽车和人脸进行下属分类时使用不同的空间频率尺度。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067024. Print 2013.
4
Expertise increases the functional overlap between face and object perception.专业知识增加了面孔和物体感知之间的功能重叠。
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
Configural and analytical processing of familiar and unfamiliar objects.熟悉和不熟悉物体的构型与分析处理
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.012. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
6
Implicit familiarity processing in congenital prosopagnosia.先天性面孔失认症中的内隐熟悉性加工
J Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;2(1):141-64. doi: 10.1348/174866407x260180.
7
Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability.经验调节物体识别与面部识别之间的重叠,表明存在一种共同能力。
J Vis. 2014 Jul 3;14(8):7. doi: 10.1167/14.8.7.
8
Human face preference in gamma-frequency EEG activity.伽马频率脑电活动中的人脸偏好
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1980-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.025. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
9
Distinct familiarity-based response patterns for faces and buildings in perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex.在眶额和旁海马皮质中,面孔和建筑物具有不同的基于熟悉度的反应模式。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 26;33(26):10915-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0126-13.2013.
10
From face processing to face recognition: Comparing three different processing levels.从面部处理到面部识别:比较三种不同的处理水平。
Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural color composition induces oddball P3 asymmetry associated with processing fluency.自然颜色成分会诱发与加工流畅性相关的失匹配负波P3不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88815-6.
2
Decoding face recognition abilities in the human brain.解读人类大脑中的人脸识别能力。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Mar 1;3(3):pgae095. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae095. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Category systems for real-world scenes.真实场景的分类系统。

本文引用的文献

1
The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition.其他种族面孔识别的神经可塑性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):122-31. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.122.
2
The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability.面部分类的首选水平取决于可辨别性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):623-9. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.623.
3
The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: a behavioral and neurophysiological study.类别学习在感知专长的习得与保持中的作用:一项行为学与神经生理学研究。
J Vis. 2021 Feb 3;21(2):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.2.8.
4
Repetition probability effects depend on prior experiences.重复概率效应取决于先前的经验。
J Neurosci. 2014 May 7;34(19):6640-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5326-13.2014.
5
Stimulus familiarity modulates functional connectivity of the perirhinal cortex and anterior hippocampus during visual discrimination of faces and objects.刺激熟悉度调节了面孔和物体视觉辨别过程中,边缘系统和前海马回的功能连接。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 4;8:117. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00117. eCollection 2014.
6
A new standardized stimulus set for studying need-of-help recognition (NeoHelp).一种用于研究需要帮助识别的新标准化刺激集(NeoHelp)。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 7;9(1):e84373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084373. eCollection 2014.
7
Fast and Famous: Looking for the Fastest Speed at Which a Face Can be Recognized.快速而著名:寻找识别面孔的最快速度。
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 4;4:100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00100. eCollection 2013.
8
How Fast is Famous Face Recognition?人脸识别有多快?
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 30;3:454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00454. eCollection 2012.
9
The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?面孔加工的早期发展——是什么让面孔变得特别?
Neurosci Bull. 2012 Dec;28(6):765-88. doi: 10.1007/s12264-012-1280-0. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
10
The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.特征和构型加工在面孔种族分类中的作用。
Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
Brain Res. 2008 May 19;1210:204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.054. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition.一项关于自我相关物体识别的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Cogn. 2007 Mar;63(2):182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
5
Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity.激活先前存在的和后天习得的面部表征:N250事件相关电位作为面部熟悉度的指标。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1488-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488.
6
A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing.对专家物体加工的电生理相关性的重新评估。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1453-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1453.
7
The training and transfer of real-world perceptual expertise.现实世界感知专业技能的训练与迁移
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00795.x.
8
Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis.性别与面部特征的感知整体性:单通道假说的进一步证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Aug;28(4):854-67.
9
The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise.人脸识别的切入点:面部专业技能的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):534-43. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.534.
10
Unitization during category learning.类别学习中的单元化
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Feb;26(1):86-112. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.86.