Ter Meulen Ruud, Maarse Hans
Centre for Ethics in medicine, University of Bristol, Hampton House, Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6AU, UK.
J Med Philos. 2008 Jun;33(3):262-79. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn011.
This article presents various developments in Dutch health care policy toward a greater role for individual financial responsibility, such as cost-control measures, priority setting, rationing, and market reform. Instead of the collective responsibility that is characteristic of previous times, one can observe in government policies an increased emphasis on the need for individuals to take care of one's own health and health care needs. Moreover, surveys point to decreasing levels of public support for "unlimited" solidarity and "irresponsible" health behavior. This article attempts to answer the question of how these policies and public attitudes are limiting the ethical principles of solidarity and equal access to care that have long guided Dutch health care policy making. The authors argue that from a moral point of view, the increased emphasis on individual responsibility is acceptable as long as it does not affect solidarity with those weak and vulnerable groups who are not able to take individual responsibility, such as the demented and mentally handicapped.
本文介绍了荷兰医疗保健政策朝着让个人承担更大经济责任方向发展的各种情况,例如成本控制措施、确定优先次序、配给和市场改革。与过去以集体责任为特征的情况不同,在政府政策中可以看到越来越强调个人有必要照顾自己的健康和医疗保健需求。此外,调查表明公众对“无限制”团结和“不负责任”的健康行为的支持程度在下降。本文试图回答这样一个问题:这些政策和公众态度是如何限制长期以来指导荷兰医疗保健政策制定的团结和公平获得医疗服务的伦理原则的。作者认为,从道德角度来看,只要对个人责任的更多强调不影响与那些无法承担个人责任的弱势群体(如痴呆症患者和智障人士)的团结,就是可以接受的。