Kober Hedy, Barrett Lisa Feldman, Joseph Josh, Bliss-Moreau Eliza, Lindquist Kristen, Wager Tor D
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 15;42(2):998-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.059. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
We performed an updated quantitative meta-analysis of 162 neuroimaging studies of emotion using a novel multi-level kernel-based approach, focusing on locating brain regions consistently activated in emotional tasks and their functional organization into distributed functional groups, independent of semantically defined emotion category labels (e.g., "anger," "fear"). Such brain-based analyses are critical if our ways of labeling emotions are to be evaluated and revised based on consistency with brain data. Consistent activations were limited to specific cortical sub-regions, including multiple functional areas within medial, orbital, and inferior lateral frontal cortices. Consistent with a wealth of animal literature, multiple subcortical activations were identified, including amygdala, ventral striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, and periaqueductal gray. We used multivariate parcellation and clustering techniques to identify groups of co-activated brain regions across studies. These analyses identified six distributed functional groups, including medial and lateral frontal groups, two posterior cortical groups, and paralimbic and core limbic/brainstem groups. These functional groups provide information on potential organization of brain regions into large-scale networks. Specific follow-up analyses focused on amygdala, periaqueductal gray (PAG), and hypothalamic (Hy) activations, and identified frontal cortical areas co-activated with these core limbic structures. While multiple areas of frontal cortex co-activated with amygdala sub-regions, a specific region of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC, Brodmann's Area 9/32) was the only area co-activated with both PAG and Hy. Subsequent mediation analyses were consistent with a pathway from dmPFC through PAG to Hy. These results suggest that medial frontal areas are more closely associated with core limbic activation than their lateral counterparts, and that dmPFC may play a particularly important role in the cognitive generation of emotional states.
我们使用一种新颖的基于多层次核的方法,对162项情绪神经影像学研究进行了更新的定量荟萃分析,重点是定位在情绪任务中持续激活的脑区,以及它们如何组织成分布式功能组,而不依赖于语义定义的情绪类别标签(例如,“愤怒”“恐惧”)。如果我们要根据与脑数据的一致性来评估和修订情绪标签的方式,那么这种基于脑的分析至关重要。持续激活仅限于特定的皮质亚区域,包括内侧、眶部和外侧额叶皮质内的多个功能区。与大量动物文献一致,我们识别出多个皮质下激活区域,包括杏仁核、腹侧纹状体、丘脑、下丘脑和导水管周围灰质。我们使用多变量分割和聚类技术来识别跨研究的共同激活脑区组。这些分析确定了六个分布式功能组,包括内侧和外侧额叶组、两个后皮质组以及边缘旁和核心边缘/脑干组。这些功能组提供了关于脑区组织成大规模网络的潜在信息。具体的后续分析集中在杏仁核、导水管周围灰质(PAG)和下丘脑(Hy)的激活上,并确定了与这些核心边缘结构共同激活的额叶皮质区域。虽然额叶皮质的多个区域与杏仁核亚区域共同激活,但背内侧前额叶皮质(dmPFC,布罗德曼9区/32区)的一个特定区域是唯一与PAG和Hy都共同激活的区域。随后的中介分析与从dmPFC经PAG到Hy的通路一致。这些结果表明,内侧额叶区域比外侧额叶区域与核心边缘激活的联系更紧密,并且dmPFC可能在情绪状态的认知产生中发挥特别重要的作用。