De Clercq Stefaan, Fontaine Johnny R J, Anseel Frederik
Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Belgium.
J Psychol. 2008 May;142(3):277-302. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.3.277-302.
In this study, the authors tested the comprehensiveness of the S. H. Schwartz (1992) value model as a conceptual framework for assessing supplementary person-organization fit. They conducted an extensive literature search in which they identified 42 value instruments or typologies that are used to measure life, work, or organizational values. Experts judged whether each of 1,578 items from these 42 instruments could be regarded as an indicator of 1 of the 10 value types identified by S. H. Schwartz (1992). The authors found that (a) 92.5% of the items could be classified into 1 of the 10 value types and (b) the remaining items suggested 2 possible new types (goal orientedness and relations). The authors also found indications that 2 value types could be split to obtain a more univocal meaning. Overall, these findings suggest that the S. H. Schwartz (1992) value model might be an appropriate comprehensive framework for studying supplementary person-organization fit.
在本研究中,作者测试了S.H.施瓦茨(1992)价值模型作为评估补充性个人-组织匹配度概念框架的全面性。他们进行了广泛的文献检索,从中识别出42种用于衡量生活、工作或组织价值观的价值工具或类型学。专家们判断这42种工具中的1578个项目中的每一个是否可被视为S.H.施瓦茨(1992)所确定的10种价值类型之一的指标。作者发现:(a)92.5%的项目可被归类为10种价值类型之一;(b)其余项目暗示了2种可能的新类型(目标导向性和关系)。作者还发现有迹象表明,2种价值类型可以细分以获得更明确的含义。总体而言,这些发现表明,S.H.施瓦茨(1992)价值模型可能是研究补充性个人-组织匹配度的一个合适的综合框架。