• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立循环性:循环工作价值观量表(CWVS)的开发与验证。

Establishing circularity: development and validation of the circular work value scale (CWVS).

作者信息

Schneider Jannick, Striebing Clemens, Hochfeld Katharina, Lorenz Timo

机构信息

Center for Responsible Research and Innovation, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1296282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296282. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296282
PMID:38646124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11026680/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Addressing the lack of German-language instruments, this study aims to develop a questionnaire that enables the measurement of work values. According to the theory of basic human values (Schwartz, 1992), a culturally fitting questionnaire is validated by covering constructs in the four broader dimensions of Social, Prestige, Intrinsic, and Extrinsic work values. Convergent, discriminant and incremental congruent validity are assessed.

METHOD

Data were collected in a cross-sectional online-based panel survey. Individuals working more than 20 h per week were included ( = 1,049). Using a genetic algorithm, an economical and valid questionnaire was designed to assess work values.

RESULTS

The 11 work values are measurable with three items each. They provide a good fit to the data with support for strict measurement invariance. The empirical associations to estimate construct validity overall reflect expected relations to social and individualistic work motives, neuroticism, environmental awareness, and basic values. Furthermore, congruent incremental validity is supported with relations to value congruence of the person-organization fit, and multidimensional scaling supports the assumed theoretical circularity of the work values.

IMPLICATIONS

This study developed a questionnaire that enables a theory-based valid measurement of work values. The questionnaire allows practitioners to economically collect information about the value structure of employees or applicants. Future research should consider the development of work values over time and investigate whether more distinctive constructs provide a better fit in the nomological network.

摘要

目标

鉴于缺乏德语工具,本研究旨在开发一份能够测量工作价值观的问卷。根据基本人类价值观理论(施瓦茨,1992年),通过涵盖社会、声望、内在和外在工作价值观这四个更广泛维度中的构念,对一份文化适配的问卷进行验证。评估收敛效度、区分效度和增量一致性效度。

方法

数据通过基于网络的横断面小组调查收集。纳入每周工作超过20小时的个体(n = 1049)。使用遗传算法设计了一份经济有效的问卷来评估工作价值观。

结果

11种工作价值观各用三个项目进行测量。它们与数据拟合良好,并支持严格的测量不变性。用于估计构念效度的实证关联总体上反映了与社会和个人主义工作动机、神经质、环境意识及基本价值观的预期关系。此外,与个人 - 组织契合度的价值一致性的关系支持了一致性增量效度,多维尺度分析支持了工作价值观假定的理论循环性。

启示

本研究开发了一份能够基于理论对工作价值观进行有效测量的问卷。该问卷使从业者能够经济地收集有关员工或求职者价值结构的信息。未来的研究应考虑工作价值观随时间的发展,并调查更具独特性的构念是否能更好地适配于理论网络。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d3/11026680/8f796132df2a/fpsyg-15-1296282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d3/11026680/8f796132df2a/fpsyg-15-1296282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d3/11026680/8f796132df2a/fpsyg-15-1296282-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing circularity: development and validation of the circular work value scale (CWVS).建立循环性:循环工作价值观量表(CWVS)的开发与验证。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1296282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296282. eCollection 2024.
2
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
3
Development and cross-cultural validation of the Goal Content for Weight Maintenance Scale (GCWMS).《体重维持目标内容量表(GCWMS)的编制及跨文化验证》。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Dec;26(8):2737-2748. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01148-x. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Validation of a German Version of the Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire by Kalshoven et al. (2011).卡尔绍芬等人(2011年)对德文版《工作中的道德领导力问卷》的验证。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00446. eCollection 2016.
5
Collective Empowerment in Online Health Communities: Scale Development and Empirical Validation.在线健康社区中的集体赋权:量表开发与实证验证
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 20;21(11):e14392. doi: 10.2196/14392.
6
Validation and Test of Measurement Invariance of the Adapted Health Consciousness Scale (HCS-G).健康意识量表(HCS-G)的适配版的验证和测量不变性检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116044.
7
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
8
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Validation of the nurse leadership and organizational culture (N-LOC) questionnaire.护士领导力和组织文化(N-LOC)问卷的验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4290-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Unifying work values: establishing a circular framework based on basic human values.统一工作价值观:基于基本人类价值观建立一个循环框架。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1526799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526799. eCollection 2025.
2
Bringing back psychological empowerment in empowerment-oriented leadership: the development of the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS).在以赋权为导向的领导中重拾心理赋权:心理赋权领导量表(PELS)的开发。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1539085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539085. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Work values and cultural background: a comparative analysis of work values of Chinese and British engineers in the UK.工作价值观与文化背景:对在英国的中国和英国工程师工作价值观的比较分析
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1144557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144557. eCollection 2023.
2
Work values across generations: Development of the New Work Values Scale (NWVS) and examination of generational differences.不同代际的工作价值观:新工作价值观量表(NWVS)的开发及代际差异研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 7;13:1028072. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028072. eCollection 2022.
3
Acting on Values: A Novel Intervention Enhancing Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being.
基于价值观行事:一种增强享乐主义和幸福主义幸福感的新型干预措施。
J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(8):3889-3908. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00585-4. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
4
Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices.处理调查数据中的粗心作答:预防、识别及推荐的最佳实践
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:577-596. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
5
You are simply not funny: Development and validation of a scale to measure failed humor in leadership.你根本就不好笑:一种衡量领导力中幽默失败的量表的开发与验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:929988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929988. eCollection 2022.
6
Adaptation of Work Values Instrument in Indonesian Final Year University Students.印度尼西亚大学最后一年学生工作价值观量表的适应性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:858688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858688. eCollection 2022.
7
You're Prettier When You Smile: Construction and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Microaggressions Against Women in the Workplace.你笑起来更漂亮:一份评估职场中对女性微侵犯的问卷的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;13:809862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809862. eCollection 2022.
8
Detecting Careless Responding in Survey Data Using Stochastic Gradient Boosting.使用随机梯度提升法检测调查数据中的粗心应答情况。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Feb;82(1):29-56. doi: 10.1177/00131644211004708. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.重新审视人员选拔中有效性的元分析估计:解决因范围限制而进行的系统过度校正问题。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;107(11):2040-2068. doi: 10.1037/apl0000994. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
10
Personal Values Across Cultures.跨文化的个人价值观。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:517-546. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100. Epub 2021 Oct 19.