Suppr超能文献

腔内泌尿外科培训模式的最新进展:1980年1月至2008年4月间文献的定性系统评价

Update on training models in endourology: a qualitative systematic review of the literature between January 1980 and April 2008.

作者信息

Schout Barbara M A, Hendrikx Ad J M, Scherpbier Albert J J A, Bemelmans Bart L H

机构信息

Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; VU Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1247-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.036. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Interest in the use of simulators in urological skills training is on the increase. To ensure effective implementation of training models, an overview of the nature and validity of the available models is of the essence.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain an overview of training models and their validity by performing a qualitative systematic review of the literature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Studies were identified through searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science between January 1980 and April 2008 using two search strategies: "urology and (training or simulat or model)" and combinations of these terms with "prostate," "kidney," "bladder," or "ureter." Studies were included if they (1) described one or more training models, and/or (2) examined the validity of training models. Studies in undergraduate education and of training models for physical examination were excluded. Validation studies were scored according to Kirkpatrick and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Forty-five articles (out of the initial list of 4753 retrieved articles, 0.9%) were included, describing 30 types of training models and 54 validation studies. The largest number of models has been described for ureterorenoscopy (nine types). Only three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), receiving a 1b OCEBM level of evidence score, were found. Studies investigating the impact of simulator training on performance in patients (criterion B validity) were scarce. The number of participants in experimental studies ranged from 7 to 136.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to growing interest in training models in urology, it is increasingly urgent to determine which of these models are most valuable for postgraduate training. Because the validation studies published so far are few in number, have low evidence levels, and are composed of only a few RCTs, it is important that more randomised controlled validation studies including larger numbers of participants are performed.

摘要

背景

泌尿外科技能培训中对模拟器使用的兴趣正在增加。为确保培训模式的有效实施,了解现有模式的性质和有效性至关重要。

目的

通过对文献进行定性系统评价,概述培训模式及其有效性。

证据获取

通过检索1980年1月至2008年4月期间的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和科学网,使用两种检索策略确定研究:“泌尿外科和(培训或模拟器或模型)”以及这些术语与“前列腺”、“肾脏”、“膀胱”或“输尿管”的组合。如果研究(1)描述了一种或多种培训模式,和/或(2)检验了培训模式的有效性,则纳入研究。本科教育研究和体格检查培训模式研究被排除。根据柯克帕特里克和牛津循证医学中心(OCEBM)的证据水平对验证研究进行评分。

证据综合

纳入了45篇文章(在最初检索到的4753篇文章中占0.9%),描述了30种培训模式和54项验证研究。输尿管镜检查的培训模式描述数量最多(9种)。仅发现三项随机对照试验(RCT),证据水平评分为OCEBM 1b级。研究模拟器培训对患者表现影响(标准B有效性)的研究很少。实验研究中的参与者数量从7人到136人不等。

结论

由于对泌尿外科培训模式的兴趣日益浓厚,确定哪些模式对研究生培训最有价值变得越来越紧迫。由于目前发表的验证研究数量少、证据水平低且仅由少数随机对照试验组成,因此进行更多包括更多参与者的随机对照验证研究很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验