Johnson April J, Moore Zack S, Edelson Paul J, Kinnane Lynda, Davies Megan, Shay David K, Balish Amanda, McCarron Meg, Blanton Lenee, Finelli Lyn, Averhoff Francisco, Bresee Joseph, Engel Jeffrey, Fiore Anthony
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;14(7):1024-30. doi: 10.3201/eid1407.080096.
School closure is a proposed strategy for reducing influenza transmission during a pandemic. Few studies have assessed how families respond to closures, or whether other interactions during closure could reduce this strategy's effect. Questionnaires were administered to 220 households (438 adults and 355 children) with school-age children in a North Carolina county during an influenza B virus outbreak that resulted in school closure. Closure was considered appropriate by 201 (91%) households. No adults missed work to solely provide childcare, and only 22 (10%) households required special childcare arrangements; 2 households incurred additional costs. Eighty-nine percent of children visited at least 1 public location during the closure despite county recommendations to avoid large gatherings. Although behavior and attitudes might differ during a pandemic, these results suggest short-term closure did not cause substantial hardship for parents. Pandemic planning guidance should address the potential for transmission in public areas during school closure.
学校关闭是一项在大流行期间减少流感传播的提议策略。很少有研究评估家庭对学校关闭的反应,或者关闭期间的其他互动是否会降低该策略的效果。在北卡罗来纳州一个县的乙型流感病毒爆发导致学校关闭期间,对220户有学龄儿童的家庭(438名成年人和355名儿童)进行了问卷调查。201户(91%)家庭认为关闭是合适的。没有成年人仅为照顾孩子而旷工,只有22户(10%)家庭需要特殊的儿童保育安排;2户家庭产生了额外费用。尽管该县建议避免大型集会,但89%的儿童在学校关闭期间至少去过1个公共场所。尽管在大流行期间行为和态度可能有所不同,但这些结果表明短期关闭并未给家长带来实质性困难。大流行规划指南应解决学校关闭期间公共场所的传播可能性问题。