Suppr超能文献

较贫困的人群获取当地资源和设施的机会是否更少?苏格兰格拉斯哥地区资源按地区贫困程度的分布情况。

Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland.

作者信息

Macintyre Sally, Macdonald Laura, Ellaway Anne

机构信息

MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(6):900-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

Abstract

It has commonly been suggested that in modern cities individual or household deprivation (for example, low income or education) is amplified by area level deprivation (for example, lack of jobs or good schools), in ways which damage the health of the poorest and increase health inequalities. The aim of this study was to determine the location of a range of resources and exposures by deprivation in a UK city. We examined the location of 42 resources in Glasgow City, Scotland, in 2005-2006, by quintile of small area deprivation. Measures included number per 1000 population, network distance to nearest resource, and percentage of data zones containing at least one of each type of resource. Twelve resources had higher density in, and/or were closer to or more common in, more deprived neighbourhoods: public nurseries, public primary schools, police stations, pharmacies, credit unions, post offices, bus stops, bingo halls, public swimming pools, public sports centres, outdoor play areas, and vacant and derelict land/buildings. Sixteen had higher density in, and/or were closer to, or more common in, more affluent neighbourhoods: public secondary schools, private schools, banks, building societies, museums/art galleries, railway stations, subway stations, tennis courts, bowling greens, private health clubs, private swimming pools, colleges, A & E hospitals, parks, waste disposal sites, and tourist attractions. Private nurseries, Universities, fire stations, general, dental and ophthalmic practices, pawn brokers, ATMs, supermarkets, fast food chains, cafes, public libraries, golf courses, and cinemas showed no clear pattern by deprivation. Thus it appears that in the early 21st century access to resources does not always disadvantage poorer neighbourhoods in the UK. We conclude that we need to ensure that theories and policies are based on up-to-date and context-specific empirical evidence on the distribution of neighbourhood resources, and to engage in further research on interactions between individual and environmental factors in shaping health and health inequalities.

摘要

人们普遍认为,在现代城市中,个人或家庭贫困(如低收入或低教育水平)会因地区层面的贫困(如缺乏工作机会或优质学校)而加剧,进而损害最贫困人口的健康并加剧健康不平等。本研究的目的是确定英国一个城市中一系列资源和暴露因素按贫困程度的分布情况。我们于2005 - 2006年,按小区域贫困程度的五分位数,研究了苏格兰格拉斯哥市42种资源的分布情况。衡量指标包括每千人口数量、到最近资源的网络距离,以及包含每种资源至少一个的数据区百分比。有12种资源在较贫困社区的密度更高、和/或距离更近或更常见:公立托儿所、公立小学、警察局、药店、信用社、邮局、公交车站、宾果游戏厅、公共游泳池、公共体育中心、户外游乐区以及闲置和废弃的土地/建筑。有16种资源在较富裕社区的密度更高、和/或距离更近或更常见:公立中学、私立学校、银行、建房互助协会、博物馆/艺术画廊、火车站、地铁站、网球场、草地保龄球球场、私人健身俱乐部、私人游泳池、学院、急症医院、公园、垃圾处理场以及旅游景点。私立托儿所、大学、消防站、综合诊所、牙科诊所、眼科诊所、当铺、自动取款机、超市、快餐连锁店、咖啡馆、公共图书馆、高尔夫球场和电影院按贫困程度未呈现出明显模式。因此,在21世纪初,英国较贫困社区获取资源并非总是处于劣势。我们得出结论,我们需要确保理论和政策基于关于社区资源分布的最新且因地制宜的实证证据,并进一步研究个体与环境因素在塑造健康及健康不平等方面的相互作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验