Fazio Lisa K, Marsh Elizabeth J
Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0086, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):180-5. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.180.
Prior research on false memories has shown that suggestibility is often reduced when the presentation rate is slowed enough to allow monitoring. We examined whether slowing presentation speed would reduce factual errors learned from fictional stories. Would subjects use the extra time to detect the errors in the stories, reducing reproduction of these errors on a later test? Surprisingly, slowing presentation speed increased the production of story errors on a later general knowledge test. Instructing the reader to mark whether each sentence contained an error, however, did decrease suggestibility. Readers appear to passively accept information presented in stories and need a constant reminder to monitor for errors. These results highlight differences between typical episodic false memories and illusions of knowledge (such as learning from fiction). Manipulations that reduce suggestibility for episodic false memories do not always reduce suggestibility for illusions of knowledge.
先前关于错误记忆的研究表明,当呈现速度足够慢以允许进行监控时,暗示性通常会降低。我们研究了减慢呈现速度是否会减少从虚构故事中学到的事实性错误。受试者会利用额外的时间来发现故事中的错误,从而减少在后续测试中对这些错误的再现吗?令人惊讶的是,减慢呈现速度在后续的常识测试中增加了故事错误的产生。然而,指示读者标记每个句子是否包含错误确实降低了暗示性。读者似乎会被动地接受故事中呈现的信息,需要不断提醒才能监控错误。这些结果凸显了典型的情景性错误记忆与知识错觉(如从虚构内容中学习)之间的差异。减少情景性错误记忆暗示性的操作并不总是能减少知识错觉的暗示性。