• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测乳腺癌风险的模型中,单核苷酸多态性的鉴别准确性。

Discriminatory accuracy from single-nucleotide polymorphisms in models to predict breast cancer risk.

作者信息

Gail Mitchell H

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd, Rm 8032, Bethesda, MD 20892-7244, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jul 16;100(14):1037-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn180. Epub 2008 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djn180
PMID:18612136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2528005/
Abstract

One purpose for seeking common alleles that are associated with disease is to use them to improve models for projecting individualized disease risk. Two genome-wide association studies and a study of candidate genes recently identified seven common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with breast cancer risk in independent samples. These seven SNPs were located in FGFR2, TNRC9 (now known as TOX3), MAP3K1, LSP1, CASP8, chromosomal region 8q, and chromosomal region 2q35. I used estimates of relative risks and allele frequencies from these studies to estimate how much these SNPs could improve discriminatory accuracy measured as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A model with these seven SNPs (AUC = 0.574) and a hypothetical model with 14 such SNPs (AUC = 0.604) have less discriminatory accuracy than a model, the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT), that is based on ages at menarche and at first live birth, family history of breast cancer, and history of breast biopsy examinations (AUC = 0.607). Adding the seven SNPs to BCRAT improved discriminatory accuracy to an AUC of 0.632, which was, however, less than the improvement from adding mammographic density. Thus, these seven common alleles provide less discriminatory accuracy than BCRAT but have the potential to improve the discriminatory accuracy of BCRAT modestly. Experience to date and quantitative arguments indicate that a huge increase in the numbers of case patients with breast cancer and control subjects would be required in genome-wide association studies to find enough SNPs to achieve high discriminatory accuracy.

摘要

寻找与疾病相关的常见等位基因的一个目的是利用它们来改进预测个体疾病风险的模型。两项全基因组关联研究和一项候选基因研究最近在独立样本中鉴定出七个与乳腺癌风险相关的常见单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。这七个SNP位于成纤维细胞生长因子受体2(FGFR2)、TNRC9(现称为TOX3)、丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶1(MAP3K1)、淋巴细胞特异性蛋白1(LSP1)、半胱天冬酶8(CASP8)、染色体区域8q和染色体区域2q35。我利用这些研究中的相对风险估计值和等位基因频率来估计这些SNP能在多大程度上提高以受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)衡量的鉴别准确性。包含这七个SNP的模型(AUC = 0.574)和包含14个此类SNP的假设模型(AUC = 0.604)的鉴别准确性低于基于初潮年龄、首次生育年龄、乳腺癌家族史和乳腺活检检查史的模型——美国国立癌症研究所的乳腺癌风险评估工具(BCRAT)(AUC = 0.607)。将这七个SNP添加到BCRAT中可将鉴别准确性提高到AUC为0.632,然而,这低于添加乳腺X线密度所带来的改善。因此,这七个常见等位基因提供的鉴别准确性低于BCRAT,但有潜力适度提高BCRAT的鉴别准确性。迄今为止的经验和定量分析表明,在全基因组关联研究中需要大幅增加乳腺癌病例患者和对照受试者的数量,以找到足够多的SNP来实现高鉴别准确性。

相似文献

1
Discriminatory accuracy from single-nucleotide polymorphisms in models to predict breast cancer risk.用于预测乳腺癌风险的模型中,单核苷酸多态性的鉴别准确性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jul 16;100(14):1037-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn180. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
2
Value of adding single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes to a breast cancer risk model.将单核苷酸多态性基因型纳入乳腺癌风险模型的价值。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 1;101(13):959-63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp130. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
3
Interactions between genetic variants and breast cancer risk factors in the breast and prostate cancer cohort consortium.遗传变异与乳腺癌和前列腺癌队列联盟中乳腺癌风险因素的相互作用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 17;103(16):1252-63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr265. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Using SNP genotypes to improve the discrimination of a simple breast cancer risk prediction model.利用 SNP 基因型提高简单乳腺癌风险预测模型的判别能力。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):887-96. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2610-2. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
5
Re: Discriminatory accuracy from single-nucleotide polymorphisms in models to predict breast cancer risk.关于:用于预测乳腺癌风险的模型中,单核苷酸多态性的鉴别准确性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 16;101(24):1731-2; author reply 1732. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp394.
6
Breast cancer risk assessment with five independent genetic variants and two risk factors in Chinese women.中国女性中五种独立遗传变异和两种风险因素的乳腺癌风险评估。
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 23;14(1):R17. doi: 10.1186/bcr3101.
7
Assessment of clinical validity of a breast cancer risk model combining genetic and clinical information.评估结合遗传和临床信息的乳腺癌风险模型的临床有效性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Nov 3;102(21):1618-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq388. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
8
Assessing interactions between the associations of common genetic susceptibility variants, reproductive history and body mass index with breast cancer risk in the breast cancer association consortium: a combined case-control study.评估乳腺癌协会联盟中常见遗传易感性变异、生殖史和体重指数与乳腺癌风险之间的相互作用:一项联合病例对照研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R110. doi: 10.1186/bcr2797. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
9
Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in US Hispanic Women.预测美国西班牙裔女性个体的绝对浸润性乳腺癌风险
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Dec 20;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw215. Print 2017 Feb.
10
Low-penetrance susceptibility variants and postmenopausal oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.低外显率易感性变异与绝经后雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌。
J Genet. 2020;99.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Lifestyle and Genetic Risk Factors in Urban Women in China Who Had Malignant or Suspected Malignant Breast Nodules Identified via Breast Cancer Screening.对在中国通过乳腺癌筛查发现患有恶性或疑似恶性乳腺结节的城市女性的生活方式和遗传风险因素的分析。
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 Mar 21:1-13. doi: 10.1159/000545279.
2
Current status and challenges of breast cancer prevention~DNA methylation would lead to groundbreaking progress in breast cancer prevention~.乳腺癌预防的现状与挑战~DNA甲基化将引领乳腺癌预防取得突破性进展~
Genes Environ. 2023 Dec 12;45(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41021-023-00287-0.
3
A novel TOX3-WDR5-ABCG2 signaling axis regulates the progression of colorectal cancer by accelerating stem-like traits and chemoresistance.一种新型的 TOX3-WDR5-ABCG2 信号轴通过加速类干细胞特性和化疗耐药性来调节结直肠癌的进展。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Sep 14;21(9):e3002256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002256. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
CogDrisk, ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, and LIBRA Risk Scores for Estimating Dementia Risk.CogDrisk、ANU-ADRI、CAIDE 和 LIBRA 风险评分用于估计痴呆风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31460.
5
The Potential Role of Small Nucleolar RNAs in Cancers - An Evidence Map.小核仁RNA在癌症中的潜在作用——证据图谱
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Apr 8;15:3851-3864. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S352333. eCollection 2022.
6
Mammographic breast density and IGF-1 gene polymorphisms rs1520220, rs2946834 and rs6219 in Polish women.波兰女性乳腺钼靶密度与IGF-1基因多态性rs1520220、rs2946834和rs6219
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021;25(3):191-197. doi: 10.5114/wo.2021.109727. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
7
A penalized regression framework for building polygenic risk models based on summary statistics from genome-wide association studies and incorporating external information.一种基于全基因组关联研究的汇总统计数据构建多基因风险模型并纳入外部信息的惩罚回归框架。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):133-143. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1764849. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
A BAYESIAN GRAPHICAL MODEL FOR GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES (GWAS).一种用于全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的贝叶斯图形模型。
Ann Appl Stat. 2016 Jun;10(2):786-811. doi: 10.1214/16-aoas909. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Validation of breast cancer risk assessment tools on a French-Canadian population-based cohort.基于法裔加拿大人群队列的乳腺癌风险评估工具验证
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 12;11(4):e045078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045078.
10
Tumor Microenvironment Analysis Identified Subtypes Associated With the Prognosis and the Tumor Response to Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer.肿瘤微环境分析确定了与膀胱癌预后及肿瘤免疫治疗反应相关的亚型。
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 1;12:551605. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.551605. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer.在一项前列腺癌全基因组关联研究中鉴定出多个基因座。
Nat Genet. 2008 Mar;40(3):310-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.91. Epub 2008 Feb 10.
2
Cumulative association of five genetic variants with prostate cancer.五种基因变异与前列腺癌的累积关联。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):910-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075819. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
3
Health care in the age of genetic medicine.基因医学时代的医疗保健。
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2670-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2670.
4
Probability of detecting disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms in case-control genome-wide association studies.在病例对照全基因组关联研究中检测疾病相关单核苷酸多态性的概率。
Biostatistics. 2008 Apr;9(2):201-15. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm032. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Common variants on chromosomes 2q35 and 16q12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.2号染色体q35区域和16号染色体q12区域的常见变异会增加雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的易感性。
Nat Genet. 2007 Jul;39(7):865-9. doi: 10.1038/ng2064. Epub 2007 May 27.
6
Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci.全基因组关联研究确定了新的乳腺癌易感基因座。
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1087-93. doi: 10.1038/nature05887.
7
A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk.半胱天冬酶8(CASP8)中的一种常见编码变异与乳腺癌风险相关。
Nat Genet. 2007 Mar;39(3):352-8. doi: 10.1038/ng1981. Epub 2007 Feb 11.
8
Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density.使用包含乳腺X线密度的模型预测白人女性浸润性乳腺癌的绝对风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Sep 6;98(17):1215-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj332.
9
On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk.论绝对风险模型的评估标准。
Biostatistics. 2005 Apr;6(2):227-39. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi005.
10
Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.比值比在评估诊断、预后或筛查标志物性能方面的局限性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 May 1;159(9):882-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh101.