• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后临床病理结果的影响。

Impact of obesity on clinicopathologic outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

作者信息

Boorjian Stephen A, Crispen Paul L, Carlson Rachel E, Rangel Laureano J, Karnes R Jeffrey, Frank Igor, Gettman Matthew T

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1471-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0056.

DOI:10.1089/end.2008.0056
PMID:18613784
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on pathologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 400 consecutive patients who underwent RALP at the Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2006. Patients were categorized as normal weight (BMI <25 kg/ m(2), n = 94), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2), n = 187), and obese (BMI >or=30 kg/m(2), n = 119). Clinicopathologic features of the groups were compared, and logistical regression analysis was used to assess the associations of BMI with pathologic and functional outcomes after RALP.

RESULTS

Overweight and obese patients were more likely to have pT(3/4) disease (P = 0.0024) and pathologic Gleason 7 to 10 cancers (P < 0.0001). Overall, 9/94 (9.6%) normal-weight patients had a positive surgical margin (SM), compared with 25/187 (13.4%) overweight patients and 21/119 (17.6%) obese men (P = 0.087). On multivariate analysis, however, increasing BMI was not significantly associated with an increased risk of positive SM (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76, P = 0.61). In addition, although obese men had longer operative times (P = 0.049) and greater intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.04), we found no association between BMI and transfusion requirement (P = 0.34), length of hospital stay (P = 0.54), or the rates of early (P = 0.37) or late (P = 0.86) complications. Moreover, in those patients with follow-up available at 1 year after RALP, obesity did not impact the return of continence (P = 0.62) or potency (P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

BMI was not an independent predictor of positive SM, complications, incontinence, or erectile dysfunction after RALP. These data suggest that RALP may offer equivalent margin rates and functional outcomes for patients across BMI.

摘要

目的

探讨体重指数(BMI)对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)后病理及功能结果的影响。

患者与方法

我们评估了2002年至2006年间在梅奥诊所连续接受RALP手术的400例患者。患者被分为正常体重(BMI<25 kg/m²,n = 94)、超重(BMI 25 - 29.9 kg/m²,n = 187)和肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m²,n = 119)三组。比较了三组的临床病理特征,并采用逻辑回归分析评估BMI与RALP术后病理及功能结果之间的关联。

结果

超重和肥胖患者更有可能患有pT(3/4)期疾病(P = 0.0024)以及病理Gleason评分7至10分的癌症(P < 0.0001)。总体而言,9/94(9.6%)的正常体重患者手术切缘阳性(SM),相比之下,超重患者中有25/187(13.4%),肥胖男性中有21/119(17.6%)(P = 0.087)。然而,多因素分析显示,BMI增加与SM阳性风险增加无显著关联(比值比1.12,95%置信区间0.72 - 1.76,P = 0.61)。此外,尽管肥胖男性手术时间更长(P = 0.049)且术中失血量更多(P = 0.04),但我们发现BMI与输血需求(P = 0.34)、住院时间(P = 0.54)或早期(P = 0.37)或晚期(P = 0.86)并发症发生率之间无关联。而且,在RALP术后1年有随访数据的患者中,肥胖对尿失禁恢复(P = 0.62)或性功能恢复(P = 0.13)无影响。

结论

BMI并非RALP术后SM阳性、并发症、尿失禁或勃起功能障碍的独立预测因素。这些数据表明,RALP可能为不同BMI的患者提供相当的切缘阳性率和功能结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of obesity on clinicopathologic outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.肥胖对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后临床病理结果的影响。
J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1471-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0056.
2
Does elevated body mass index (BMI) affect the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a prospective cohort study.超重指数(BMI)升高是否会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)的临床结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2014 Oct;12(10):1055-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.408. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
3
Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助与纯腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.049. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
4
The effect of BMI on clinicopathologic and functional outcomes after open radical prostatectomy.体重指数对开放性根治性前列腺切除术后临床病理及功能结局的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Apr;32(3):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
5
Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较:基于经过验证的生活质量结局的比较效果研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):898-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10551.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
6
Radical prostatectomy: initial experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures at a large university hospital.根治性前列腺切除术:大型大学医院机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的初步经验。
Scand J Urol. 2014 Jun;48(3):252-8. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.868514. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放手术的比较:单刀医生的学习曲线比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0569. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Comparison of urinary continence outcome between robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术尿控结果的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Apr;97(4):393-8.
9
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术:从单纯腹腔镜手术向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变。
Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9.
10
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in men with metabolic syndrome.代谢综合征男性患者的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40.e9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging does not impact surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy.术前前列腺磁共振成像不会影响根治性前列腺切除术的手术结果。
Indian J Urol. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4):266-271. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_115_24. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes in obese patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.达芬奇机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗肥胖患者的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Sep 23;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01595-5.
3
Association between body mass index and localized prostate cancer management and disease-specific quality of life.
体重指数与局限性前列腺癌管理及疾病特异性生活质量之间的关联。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Nov 2;4(2):223-233. doi: 10.1002/bco2.197. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Should obesity be associated with worse urinary continence outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? a propensity score matching analysis.肥胖是否与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控结果更差相关?倾向评分匹配分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jan-Feb;48(1):122-130. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0457.
5
Patient-reported quality of life recovery curves after robotic prostatectomy are similar across body mass index categories.机器人前列腺切除术后患者报告的生活质量恢复曲线在身体质量指数类别中相似。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep;58(5):331-338. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.331. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.肥胖患者机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放性根治性前列腺切除术的病理及肿瘤学结果匹配比较。
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1326-1. Epub 2014 May 23.
7
Influence of obesity on localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.肥胖对接受根治性前列腺切除术的局限性前列腺癌患者的影响。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Nov;15(6):747-52. doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.104. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
8
Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.腹腔镜和机器人根治性前列腺切除术在肥胖和极度肥胖男性中的疗效。
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese patient.肥胖患者的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术
Prostate Cancer. 2011;2011:618623. doi: 10.1155/2011/618623. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10
Impact of obesity on early erectile function recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy.肥胖对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期勃起功能恢复的影响。
JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):32-7. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466009203.