Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜和机器人根治性前列腺切除术在肥胖和极度肥胖男性中的疗效。

Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.

机构信息

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the operative and pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with progressive changes in body mass index (BMI) category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-surgeon series of 1023 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (mostly extraperitoneal) patients was considered. Of these patients, 987 were evaluable. Results were stratified by the World Health Organization BMI category. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was used to model the operating time, length of stay, positive surgical margins, and noncurable cancer.

RESULTS

Of the 987 patients, 563 (57%) were overweight and 193 (19.6%) were obese. Of the 193 obese patients, 152 (15.4%) had a BMI of 30 to <35 kg/m(2) (class I obesity), 28 (2.8%) a BMI of 35 to <40 kg/m(2) (class II), and 13 (1.3%) a BMI of ≥40 kg/m(2) (class III). No differences were found in the estimated blood loss, complications, PSM, pathologic stage, or biochemical recurrence across the BMI categories (6-month median follow-up). However, pelvic lymph node dissection was more commonly omitted and the nerve-sparing score was inferior in the obese men. On multivariate analysis, a higher BMI was a significant predictor of a longer operating time.

CONCLUSION

Obese men can safely undergo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, although the ability to perform excellent nerve sparing appears to decrease with increasing obesity. Nevertheless, obese men can expect perioperative and early oncologic outcomes comparable to those of normal weight men without an increased risk of perioperative complications.

摘要

目的

评估体质量指数(BMI)类别变化的男性中腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术和病理结果。

材料和方法

考虑了一位外科医生进行的 1023 例腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(大多为腹膜外)的单一系列。其中 987 例患者可评估。结果按世界卫生组织 BMI 类别分层。使用多元线性和逻辑回归分析来模拟手术时间、住院时间、阳性手术切缘和不可治愈的癌症。

结果

在 987 例患者中,563 例(57%)超重,193 例(19.6%)肥胖。在 193 例肥胖患者中,152 例(15.4%)BMI 为 30 至 <35 kg/m²(I 类肥胖),28 例(2.8%)BMI 为 35 至 <40 kg/m²(II 类),13 例(1.3%)BMI 为 ≥40 kg/m²(III 类)。在 BMI 类别中,估计出血量、并发症、PSM、病理分期或生化复发没有差异(6 个月中位数随访)。然而,肥胖男性中更常见省略盆腔淋巴结清扫术,并且神经保留评分较差。在多变量分析中,较高的 BMI 是手术时间延长的显著预测因子。

结论

肥胖男性可以安全地接受腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术,尽管随着肥胖程度的增加,实现良好神经保留的能力似乎会下降。然而,肥胖男性可以预期与正常体重男性相当的围手术期和早期肿瘤学结果,而不会增加围手术期并发症的风险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验