Suppr超能文献

职业性哮喘的评估结果。

Outcome of assessments for occupational asthma.

作者信息

Tarlo S M, Broder I

机构信息

Toronto General Hospital, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 1991 Aug;100(2):329-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.2.329.

Abstract

Among 154 referrals to a university hospital clinic for assessment of possible occupational asthma, the feasibility and results of different investigations were assessed using a consistent approach to all patients. A positive skin test to a workplace allergen (14 percent of all subjects), positive peak flow workplace changes (12 percent), improvement in methacholine response on holiday (9 percent), and/or positive specific challenge testing (14 percent) supported the diagnosis of occupational asthma in 61 subjects (39 percent of the total referrals). Fifty-one of these were related to a workplace sensitizer and ten to a presumed irritant. Occupational asthma was excluded in 48 subjects (31 percent) who had normal methacholine responsiveness within 24 hours of work (22 percent of the 154 subjects), peak flow readings no worse at work than on holidays (14 percent of the total referrals) and/or negative specific challenge testing (10 percent of the total referrals). Insufficient information could be obtained for a diagnosis in the remaining 45 subjects (28 percent). No single investigation was considered diagnostic in this study, as each could be positive or negative for other reasons.

摘要

在转诊至一家大学医院诊所评估可能的职业性哮喘的154例患者中,采用一致的方法对所有患者评估了不同检查的可行性和结果。对工作场所过敏原皮肤试验呈阳性(占所有受试者的14%)、工作场所峰值流量变化呈阳性(12%)、假期期间乙酰甲胆碱反应改善(9%)和/或特异性激发试验呈阳性(14%),支持61例受试者(占转诊总数的39%)诊断为职业性哮喘。其中51例与工作场所致敏原有关,10例与推测的刺激物有关。48例受试者(占154例受试者的31%)被排除职业性哮喘,这些受试者在工作24小时内乙酰甲胆碱反应正常(占154例受试者的22%)、工作时峰值流量读数不比假期时差(占转诊总数的14%)和/或特异性激发试验阴性(占转诊总数的10%)。其余45例受试者(28%)无法获得足够信息进行诊断。本研究中没有单一检查被认为具有诊断性,因为每项检查都可能因其他原因呈阳性或阴性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验