Seery Mark D, Silver Roxane Cohen, Holman E Alison, Ence Whitney A, Chu Thai Q
Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4110, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):657-67. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.657.
Collective traumas can negatively affect large numbers of people who ostensibly did not experience events directly, making it particularly important to identify which people are most vulnerable to developing mental and physical health problems as a result of such events. It is commonly believed that successful coping with a traumatic event requires expressing one's thoughts and feelings about the experience, suggesting that people who choose not to do so would be at high risk for poor adjustment. To test this idea in the context of collective trauma, 2,138 members of a nationally representative Web-enabled survey panel were given the opportunity to express their reactions to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, on that day and those following. Follow-up surveys assessing mental and physical health outcomes were completed over the next 2 years. Contrary to common belief, participants who chose not to express any initial reaction reported better outcomes over time than did those who expressed an initial reaction. Among those who chose to express their immediate reactions, longer responses predicted worse outcomes over time. Implications for myths of coping, posttrauma interventions, and psychology in the media are discussed.
集体创伤会对大量表面上并未直接经历相关事件的人产生负面影响,因此,确定哪些人最容易因这类事件而出现身心健康问题就显得尤为重要。人们普遍认为,成功应对创伤性事件需要表达自己对该经历的想法和感受,这表明选择不这样做的人适应不良的风险很高。为了在集体创伤的背景下验证这一观点,一个具有全国代表性的网络调查小组的2138名成员有机会在2001年9月11日当天及之后表达他们对恐怖袭击的反应。在接下来的两年里完成了评估身心健康结果的后续调查。与普遍看法相反,选择不表达任何初始反应的参与者随着时间的推移报告的结果比那些表达了初始反应的参与者更好。在那些选择表达即时反应的人中,较长的反应预示着随着时间的推移结果会更糟。文中还讨论了应对神话、创伤后干预措施以及媒体中的心理学等方面的意义。