• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性和复杂性乙状结肠憩室炎的选择性腹腔镜手术治疗

Elective laparoscopic surgical management of recurrent and complicated sigmoid diverticulitis.

作者信息

Lu C-T, Ho Y-H

机构信息

Department of Surgery School of Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Sep;12(3):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0421-y. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-008-0421-y
PMID:18679576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To review the results of elective laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) for recurrent and complicated sigmoid diverticulitis, and determine the factors associated with surgical complications.

METHODS

Data on patients who had had elective surgery for recurrent and complicated sigmoid diverticulitis were extracted from a prospective computerized database.

RESULTS

Review of the database revealed 62 consecutive patients who had undergone LAR. These patients were initially compared with 20 patients who had undergone elective open anterior resection (OAR). There were no significant differences between the groups in relation to age, sex, indication for surgery, Hinchey stage of perforation, extent of adhesions or comorbidities. The intraoperative time for LAR was significantly shorter (mean+/-SEM 110.87+/-4.8 min vs. OAR 134.35+/-8.4; p=0.032) and blood loss was less (88+/-18 ml vs. OAR 134+/-24 ml; p=0.003). Postoperative passage of flatus occurred earlier after LAR (p<0.003). Hospital stay was shorter after LAR (p<0.001). Complications occurred in nine patients (15%) after LAR and in six patients (30%) after OAR (p=NS). Among the LAR patients the risk of complications was higher in those with preexisting comorbidities (p=0.037). Time to postoperative passage of flatus correlated positively with age (p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective LAR for recurrent and complicated sigmoid diverticulitis could be performed safely and expediently. Bowel function recovered later in older patients. The risk of medical complications was related to preexisting comorbidities.

摘要

背景

回顾择期腹腔镜前切除术(LAR)治疗复发性和复杂性乙状结肠憩室炎的结果,并确定与手术并发症相关的因素。

方法

从一个前瞻性计算机数据库中提取因复发性和复杂性乙状结肠憩室炎接受择期手术患者的数据。

结果

数据库回顾显示62例连续接受LAR的患者。这些患者最初与20例接受择期开放性前切除术(OAR)的患者进行比较。两组在年龄、性别、手术指征、穿孔的欣奇(Hinchey)分期、粘连程度或合并症方面无显著差异。LAR的术中时间明显更短(平均±标准误110.87±4.8分钟 vs. OAR 134.35±8.4分钟;p = 0.032),失血量更少(88±18毫升 vs. OAR 134±24毫升;p = 0.003)。LAR后术后排气更早(p < 0.003)。LAR后住院时间更短(p < 0.001)。LAR后9例患者(15%)发生并发症,OAR后6例患者(30%)发生并发症(p = 无显著性差异)。在LAR患者中,有既往合并症者并发症风险更高(p = 0.037)。术后排气时间与年龄呈正相关(p = 0.004)。

结论

择期LAR治疗复发性和复杂性乙状结肠憩室炎可安全、便捷地进行。老年患者肠道功能恢复较晚。医疗并发症风险与既往合并症有关。

相似文献

1
Elective laparoscopic surgical management of recurrent and complicated sigmoid diverticulitis.复发性和复杂性乙状结肠憩室炎的选择性腹腔镜手术治疗
Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Sep;12(3):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0421-y. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
2
Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.明确腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠切除术在憩室炎治疗中的作用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Dec;43(12):1726-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02236858.
3
Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.腹腔镜下乙状结肠憩室炎切除术。一项多中心研究的结果。腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Jun;13(6):567-71. doi: 10.1007/s004649901042.
4
Laparoscopic sigmoid resections for diverticulitis complicated by abscesses or fistulas.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗并发脓肿或瘘管的憩室炎。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Dec;22(12):1515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0359-y. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
5
Predictive risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 526 laparoscopic sigmoid resections due to recurrent diverticulitis: a multivariate analysis.526 例因复发性憩室炎而行腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的术中及术后并发症的预测性风险因素:多因素分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):677-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0889-2.
6
Are there differences in outcome after elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease and for cancer? A national inpatient study.憩室病和癌症行择期乙状结肠切除术后的结局是否存在差异?一项全国性住院患者研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;19(3):260-265. doi: 10.1111/codi.13461.
7
Elective minimally invasive surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis: operative outcomes of patients with complicated versus uncomplicated disease.择期微创外科手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎:伴有复杂与不伴复杂疾病患者的手术结局。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2948-2954. doi: 10.1111/codi.15837. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
An outcome analysis of laparoscopic management of diverticulitis.腹腔镜治疗憩室炎的疗效分析
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;37(5):430-438. doi: 10.1007/s12664-018-0907-0. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
9
Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients.腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗复发性和复杂性憩室炎:396例患者的前瞻性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Apr;389(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0454-7. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
10
Elective Laparoscopic Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticulitis-an Updated Look at Recurrence After Surgery.择期腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎-手术后复发的最新观察。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Feb;24(2):388-395. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04083-y. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Over 1-Year Followup of Laparoscopic Treatment of Enterovesical Fistula.腹腔镜治疗小肠膀胱瘘的1年以上随访
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00095.
2
Mortality and complications following surgery for diverticulitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.憩室炎手术后的死亡率和并发症:系统评价与荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Oct;4(5):706-713. doi: 10.1177/2050640615617357. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
3
Laparoscopic treatment of colovesical fistulas due to complicated colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗憩室病:非随机研究的荟萃分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Apr;49(4):446-63. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0316-1.
2
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌:一项随机试验的短期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):477-84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7.
3
Diverticulosis coli: update on a "Western" disease.结肠憩室病:一种“西方”疾病的最新情况
腹腔镜治疗复杂性结肠憩室病所致结肠膀胱瘘:一项系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Oct;18(10):873-85. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1157-5. Epub 2014 May 7.
4
Laparoscopic management of diverticular colovesical fistula: experience in 15 cases and review of the literature.腹腔镜治疗结肠膀胱憩室瘘:15例经验及文献复习
Int Surg. 2013 Apr-Jun;98(2):101-9. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00024.1.
5
Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.憩室炎的微创手术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S11-22. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0940-4. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
6
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹 Hartmann 手术治疗憩室炎急症:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jan;56(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182749cf5.
7
Surgical treatment of acute recurrent diverticulitis: early elective or late elective surgery. An analysis of 237 patients.手术治疗急性复发性憩室炎:早期选择性手术还是晚期选择性手术。对 237 例患者的分析。
World J Surg. 2012 Apr;36(4):898-907. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1456-9.
8
Laparoscopic one-stage resection of right and left colon complicated diverticulitis equivalent to Hinchey stage I-II.腹腔镜一期切除右半结肠和左半结肠合并憩室炎相当于 Hinchey Ⅰ-Ⅱ期。
Surg Today. 2011 May;41(5):647-54. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4349-2. Epub 2011 May 1.
9
Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial.择期开放与腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病:Sigma 试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2883-901. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0762-3.
10
Enterovesical fistulas: diagnosis and management.肠膀胱瘘:诊断与处理。
Tech Coloproctol. 2010 Dec;14(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0602-3. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
Adv Anat Pathol. 2005 Mar;12(2):74-80. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000155054.76119.dc.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Dec;14(6):329-34. doi: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.329.
5
Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis.腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗憩室炎
Curr Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;61(4):366-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2003.08.017.
6
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助结肠癌切除术与开腹结肠癌切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651.
7
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study.手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术与开放性结肠切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):577-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8148-3. Epub 2004 Mar 19.
8
Risk factors for mortality and morbidity after elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: prospective multicenter multivariate analysis of 582 patients.憩室炎择期乙状结肠切除术后死亡和发病的危险因素:对582例患者的前瞻性多中心多变量分析
World J Surg. 2004 Jan;28(1):92-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7146-x. Epub 2003 Nov 26.
9
Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy.评估POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统在评估腹腔镜结肠切除术后的预后情况。
Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1280-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4224.
10
Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy.年龄和手术类型会影响腹腔镜结肠切除术患者的选择。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):923-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8949-9. Epub 2003 Mar 7.