• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危患者“无法取出”胆总管结石的永久性支架置入。一项比较两种不同支架的前瞻性随机研究。

Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.

作者信息

Pisello Franco, Geraci Girolamo, Li Volsi Francesco, Modica Giuseppe, Sciumè Carmelo

机构信息

Section of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Sicily, Italy.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Nov;393(6):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0388-1. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-008-0388-1
PMID:18679709
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for bile duct stones. Therefore, if ES and conventional stone extraction fail, further treatment is mandatory. Insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis is an effective option.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We treated 30 high-risk patients (17 women and 13 men, mean age 82 years) affected by difficult common bile duct stones. The patients were randomly assigned preoperatively using closed envelopes (blind randomization) into two groups to receive insertion of polyethylene or hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stent, respectively. Follow-up was achieved by contacting referring physicians and patient's relatives.

RESULTS

Biliary drainage was established in all patients. Early minor complications occurred in 28%. In all these patients, the stent was a definitive measure. Median follow-up was 38 months. Late complications occurred in 34%. Cholangitis was the most frequent. During follow up, 11 patients died, two as result of a biliary-related cause. No statistically significant difference was observed on different stents patency.

CONCLUSION

Endoprosthesis insertion as a permanent therapy is an effective alternative to surgery or dissolution therapy. Therefore, biliary stenting should preferably be restricted to high-risk patients unfit for operative treatment and with a short life expectancy.

摘要

背景

内镜括约肌切开术(ES)及取石术是胆管结石的首选治疗方法。因此,如果ES及传统取石术失败,进一步治疗是必要的。插入胆道内支架是一种有效的选择。

材料与方法

我们治疗了30例患有复杂胆总管结石的高危患者(17例女性和13例男性,平均年龄82岁)。术前使用密封信封将患者随机分组(盲法随机化),分别接受插入聚乙烯或亲水性水凝胶涂层聚氨酯支架。通过联系转诊医生和患者亲属进行随访。

结果

所有患者均建立了胆道引流。28%的患者发生早期轻微并发症。在所有这些患者中,支架是一种确定性措施。中位随访时间为38个月。34%的患者发生晚期并发症。胆管炎最为常见。随访期间,11例患者死亡,2例死于与胆道相关的原因。不同支架通畅情况未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

插入内支架作为一种永久性治疗方法是手术或溶石治疗的有效替代方案。因此,胆道支架置入术应最好仅限于不适合手术治疗且预期寿命较短的高危患者。

相似文献

1
Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.高危患者“无法取出”胆总管结石的永久性支架置入。一项比较两种不同支架的前瞻性随机研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Nov;393(6):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0388-1. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
2
Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients.老年患者内镜下无法取出的胆总管结石的胆道内支架置入术:117例患者的报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Sep;42(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70091-9.
3
Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting.内镜括约肌切开术后胆总管结石残留:胆管支架置入的短期及长期治疗
Tunis Med. 2011 Apr;89(4):342-6.
4
Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting.内镜下括约肌切开术后胆总管结石残留:胆道支架置入的短期和长期治疗
Gut. 1995 Mar;36(3):446-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.36.3.446.
5
The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.长期使用胆道支架治疗大结石后,留置内假体对结石大小或碎裂的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1552-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9240-9. Epub 2003 Aug 15.
6
Do not rush for surgery; stent placement may be an effective step for definitive treatment of initially unextractable common bile duct stones with ERCP.不要急于进行手术;对于最初无法取出的胆总管结石,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)下放置支架可能是确定性治疗的有效步骤。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4355-y. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
7
Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial.亲水涂层聚氨酯支架与未涂层支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的随机试验
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Jan;51(1):8-11. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70378-6.
8
[Palliative treatment of large bile duct stones by endoscopic implantation of endoprosthesis in high risk patients].[高危患者内镜下植入内支架姑息治疗大胆管结石]
Orv Hetil. 1996 Mar 3;137(9):461-4.
9
Endoscopic stenting in the management of biliary stones.内镜支架置入术在胆管结石治疗中的应用
Singapore Med J. 1996 Oct;37(5):475-8.
10
A prospective randomized study of hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane versus polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction.亲水性聚合物涂层聚氨酯支架与聚乙烯支架用于远端恶性胆管梗阻的前瞻性随机研究。
Endoscopy. 2003 Jun;35(6):478-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39666.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is superior to biliary stent placement in preventing postendoscopic papillary balloon dilation pancreatitis.在内镜下乳头球囊扩张术后预防胰腺炎方面,内镜鼻胆管引流术优于胆管支架置入术。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 29;18:17562848251365025. doi: 10.1177/17562848251365025. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience.超过五年被遗忘的胆道支架的结果——二十年的经验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug;43(4):768-774. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01493-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
Biliary stents are forgotten more frequently in elderly patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-diameter balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of difficult bile duct stones.内镜括约肌切开术后使用大直径球囊扩张术治疗难取性胆管结石。
Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):209-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-967040. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
2
Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones.影响内镜下胆管结石清除技术难度的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Dec;66(6):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.04.033. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
Mechanical lithotripsy of pancreatic and biliary stones: complications and available treatment options collected from expert centers.
老年患者更容易遗忘胆道支架。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 13;51(6):3067-3072. doi: 10.3906/sag-2104-108.
4
Long-term Outcomes of Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Patients ≥90 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.90岁及以上患者治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的长期结局:一项多中心回顾性研究
Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;60(13):1989-1997. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6478-20. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Management of endoscopic biliary stenting for choledocholithiasis: Evaluation of stent-exchange intervals.胆总管结石内镜下胆道支架置入术的管理:支架更换间隔的评估
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan 16;10(1):45-50. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i1.45.
6
Multiple plastic biliary stent placement in the management of large and multiple choledochal stones: single center experience and review of the literature.多根塑料胆管支架置入术治疗巨大及多发胆总管结石:单中心经验及文献综述
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):231-237. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.69107. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.《2016年胆石症循证临床实践指南》
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;52(3):276-300. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1289-7. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
8
Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的不良事件:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2014 Mar;2(1):E28-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365281. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
9
Do not rush for surgery; stent placement may be an effective step for definitive treatment of initially unextractable common bile duct stones with ERCP.不要急于进行手术;对于最初无法取出的胆总管结石,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)下放置支架可能是确定性治疗的有效步骤。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4355-y. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review.遗忘胆管支架的长期影响:病例系列及文献综述
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Aug 15;7(8):2045-52. eCollection 2014.
胰胆结石的机械碎石术:并发症及来自专家中心的可用治疗方案
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):1896-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01350.x. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
4
Risk factors for acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones.胆管结石引起急性化脓性胆管炎的危险因素。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jul;19(7):585-8. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3281532b78.
5
De novo stent-stone complex after long-term biliary stent placement: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and endotherapy.长期胆道支架置入术后新发支架结石复合体:发病机制、诊断及内镜治疗
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.026. Epub 2007 May 23.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones.体外冲击波碎石术用于清除难治性胆管结石。
Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Mar;39(3):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.003. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
7
Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic).胆结石病:胆石(胆总管和肝内)的流行病学、发病机制及分类
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.009.
8
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2.
9
[Prevention of clogging of biliary stents by administration of levofloxacin and ursodeoxycholic acid].[通过给予左氧氟沙星和熊去氧胆酸预防胆道支架堵塞]
Chir Ital. 2004 Nov-Dec;56(6):831-7.
10
The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.长期使用胆道支架治疗大结石后,留置内假体对结石大小或碎裂的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1552-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9240-9. Epub 2003 Aug 15.