• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤对生活质量的影响:多学科治疗后的纵向研究

Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment.

作者信息

de Reuver P R, Sprangers M A, Rauws E A, Lameris J S, Busch O R, van Gulik T M, Gouma D J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2008 Aug;40(8):637-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077444.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1077444
PMID:18680076
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Bile duct injury (BDI) is associated with increased morbidity and poor survival. The aim of the present study was to compare quality of life (QoL) between patients with BDI and those without after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A longitudinal assessment was performed and risk factors for poor QoL were determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In March 2005 a survey was performed of 403 eligible patients with BDI who were referred to a tertiary center for multidisciplinary treatment by gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons. A longitudinal quality-of-life study was performed to determine changes in outcome after a mean of 5.5 and 11 years' follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the eligible 403 patients with BDI, 278 (69 %) responded to the survey after a mean follow-up of 5.9 years. The quality-of-life outcome of injured patients was significantly lower in three of the eight domains compared to patients who underwent cholecystectomy without an injury ( P < 0.05). In seven of the eight QoL domains injured patients scored significantly worse than the healthy population norms ( P < 0.05). The longitudinal assessment after another 5.5 years of follow-up did not show improvement in QoL. Clinical characteristics such as the type of injury and the type of treatment did not affect outcome. Nineteen percent of the patients (n = 53) filed a malpractice claim after BDI. These patients reported better QoL (effect size = 0.6, P = 0.02) when the claim was resolved in their favor than when the claim was rejected.

CONCLUSIONS

BDI has a detrimental effect on long-term QoL. QoL in patients with BDI is poor and does not improve during follow-up. The outcome of a malpractice litigation claim is associated with QoL.

摘要

背景与研究目的

胆管损伤(BDI)与发病率增加及生存率降低相关。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤患者与未发生胆管损伤患者的生活质量(QoL)。进行了纵向评估并确定了生活质量差的危险因素。

患者与方法

2005年3月,对403例符合条件的胆管损伤患者进行了调查,这些患者由胃肠病学家、放射科医生和外科医生转诊至三级中心接受多学科治疗。进行了一项纵向生活质量研究,以确定平均随访5.5年和11年后的结果变化。

结果

在403例符合条件的胆管损伤患者中,278例(69%)在平均随访5.9年后对调查做出了回应。与未发生损伤的胆囊切除术患者相比,损伤患者在八个领域中的三个领域的生活质量结果显著更低(P<0.05)。在八个生活质量领域中的七个领域,损伤患者的得分显著低于健康人群标准(P<0.05)。在另外5.5年的随访后的纵向评估未显示生活质量有所改善。损伤类型和治疗类型等临床特征不影响结果。19%的患者(n = 53)在胆管损伤后提起了医疗事故索赔。当索赔得到有利于他们的解决时,这些患者报告的生活质量更好(效应大小 = 0.6,P = 0.02),而当索赔被驳回时则不然。

结论

胆管损伤对长期生活质量有不利影响。胆管损伤患者的生活质量较差,且在随访期间没有改善。医疗事故诉讼索赔的结果与生活质量相关。

相似文献

1
Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤对生活质量的影响:多学科治疗后的纵向研究
Endoscopy. 2008 Aug;40(8):637-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077444.
2
Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤患者的生存情况:胃肠病学家、放射科医生和外科医生的多学科治疗方法
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.004.
3
Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a case control study.医源性胆管损伤后的生活质量:一项病例对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2009 Feb;249(2):292-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195c50c.
4
Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life.胆管损伤对健康相关生活质量的长期有害影响。
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):476-81; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.476.
5
Management of bile duct injury during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间及术后胆管损伤的处理
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9230-3. Epub 2002 Oct 21.
6
Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury.转诊模式和修复时机是胆管损伤重建手术后并发症的危险因素。
Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):763-70. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000252442.91839.44.
7
Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury - a case control study.医源性胆管损伤后的生活质量——一项病例对照研究。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013 Jun;22(3):177-80. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2012.752751. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
8
Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic arterial injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后合并胆管和肝动脉损伤患者的管理与预后
Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2003.11.018.
9
Trauma in adolescents causes long-term marked deficits in quality of life: adolescent children do not recover preinjury quality of life or function up to two years postinjury compared to national norms.青少年创伤会导致长期显著的生活质量缺陷:与全国标准相比,受伤青少年在受伤后长达两年的时间里无法恢复到受伤前的生活质量或功能水平。
J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):577-83; discussion 583. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318031aa97.
10
[Surgical treatment of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Does the concomitant hepatic arterial injury influence the long-term outcome?].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的外科治疗。合并肝动脉损伤是否会影响长期预后?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Dec;129(6):487-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832413.

引用本文的文献

1
Indocyanine green fluorescence improves safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Fundus First technique: a retrospective study.吲哚菁绿荧光成像在采用先处理胆囊底部技术的腹腔镜胆囊切除术中提高安全性:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 23;12:1516709. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1516709. eCollection 2025.
2
How much is the long-term quality of life impaired in cholecystectomy-related biliary tract injury?胆囊切除术相关胆道损伤对长期生活质量的损害程度如何?
Turk J Surg. 2023 Mar 3;39(1):34-42. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5780. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Intraoperative Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术术中胆管造影:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00093.
4
Cholecystectomy for asymptomatic gallstones: Markov decision tree analysis.无症状胆结石的胆囊切除术:马尔可夫决策树分析
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Oct 16;10(29):10399-10412. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i29.10399.
5
Actuarial Patency Rates of Hepatico-Jejunal Anastomosis after Repair of Bile Duct Injury at a Reference Center.某参考中心胆管损伤修复术后肝空肠吻合术的精算通畅率
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 13;11(12):3396. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123396.
6
The Role of the Interventional Radiologist in Bile Leak Diagnosis and Management.介入放射科医生在胆漏诊断与管理中的作用
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Aug;38(3):309-320. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731369. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
7
Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: systematic review, meta-analysis and health economic model analysis of iatrogenic bile duct injury.常规与选择性术中胆管造影在胆囊切除术中的应用:医源性胆管损伤的系统评价、荟萃分析和健康经济学模型分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa032.
8
Fluorescent cholangiography significantly improves patient outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.荧光胆管造影术显著改善了腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的治疗效果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5729-5739. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08045-x. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.医源性胆管损伤的长期影响。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(1):10-21. doi: 10.1159/000496432. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Management of Segmental Bile Duct Injuries After Cholecystectomy: a Systematic Review.胆囊切除术后区域性胆管损伤的处理:系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):408-416. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4027-z. Epub 2018 Nov 6.