• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医源性胆管损伤后的生活质量:一项病例对照研究。

Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a case control study.

作者信息

Hogan Aisling M, Hoti Emir, Winter Desmond C, Ridgway Paul F, Maguire Donal, Geoghegan Justin G, Traynor Oscar

机构信息

St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2009 Feb;249(2):292-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195c50c.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195c50c
PMID:19212184
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare quality of life (QOL) of patients following iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) to matched controls.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

BDI complicate approximately 0.3% of all cholecystectomy procedures. The literature regarding impact on quality of life is conflicted as assessment using clinical determinants alone is insufficient.

METHODS

The medical outcomes study short form 36 (SF-36), a sensitive tool for quantification of life quality outcome, was used. The study group of iatrogenic BDI was compared with an age- and sex-matched group who underwent uncomplicated cholecystectomy. Telephone questionnaire using the SF-36 quality of life tool was administered to both groups at a median postoperative time of 12 years 8 months (range, 2 months -20 years).

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were referred with BDI but due to mortality (n = 10) and unavailability (n = 6) 62 participated. The age- and sex-matched control cohort had undergone uncomplicated cholecystectomy (n = 62). Comparison between groups revealed that 7 of 8 variables examined were statistically similar to those of the control group (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality and social functioning, and mental health index). Mean role emotional scores were slightly worse in the BDI group (46 vs. 50) but the significance was borderline (P = 0.045). Subgroup analysis by method of intervention for BDI did not demonstrate significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life of surviving patients following BDI compares favorably to that after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

目的

比较医源性胆管损伤(BDI)患者与匹配对照组的生活质量(QOL)。

总结背景数据

BDI在所有胆囊切除术患者中约占0.3%。关于其对生活质量影响的文献存在矛盾,因为仅使用临床指标进行评估是不够的。

方法

采用医学结局研究简表36(SF - 36),这是一种用于量化生活质量结局的敏感工具。将医源性BDI研究组与年龄和性别匹配的单纯胆囊切除术组进行比较。在术后中位时间12年8个月(范围2个月至20年),对两组进行电话问卷调查,使用SF - 36生活质量工具。

结果

78例患者因BDI前来就诊,但由于死亡(n = 10)和无法联系(n = 6),62例患者参与研究。年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行了单纯胆囊切除术(n = 62)。组间比较显示,所检查的8个变量中有7个在统计学上与对照组相似(身体功能、角色功能、身体疼痛、总体健康感知、活力、社会功能和心理健康指数)。BDI组的平均角色情感得分略低(46对50),但差异接近临界值(P = 0.045)。按BDI干预方法进行的亚组分析未显示出显著差异。

结论

BDI存活患者的生活质量与单纯腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者的生活质量相比具有优势。

相似文献

1
Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a case control study.医源性胆管损伤后的生活质量:一项病例对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2009 Feb;249(2):292-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195c50c.
2
Quality-of-life assessment of surgical reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced bile duct injuries: what happens at 5 years and beyond?腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤外科重建的生活质量评估:5年及以后会发生什么?
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):483-8; discussion 488-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.483.
3
Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤对生活质量的影响:多学科治疗后的纵向研究
Endoscopy. 2008 Aug;40(8):637-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077444.
4
Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life.胆管损伤对健康相关生活质量的长期有害影响。
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):476-81; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.476.
5
Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury - a case control study.医源性胆管损伤后的生活质量——一项病例对照研究。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013 Jun;22(3):177-80. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2012.752751. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
Survival in bile duct injury patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidisciplinary approach of gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤患者的生存情况:胃肠病学家、放射科医生和外科医生的多学科治疗方法
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.004.
7
Management of bile duct injury during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间及术后胆管损伤的处理
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9230-3. Epub 2002 Oct 21.
8
[Surgical treatment of iatrogenic bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of long-term results. Retrospective clinical study in 51 patients operated in the Campania region from 1991 to 2003].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术后医源性胆管损伤的外科治疗:长期结果分析。对1991年至2003年在坎帕尼亚地区接受手术的51例患者的回顾性临床研究]
Chir Ital. 2005 Jul-Aug;57(4):417-24.
9
[Surgical treatment of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Does the concomitant hepatic arterial injury influence the long-term outcome?].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的外科治疗。合并肝动脉损伤是否会影响长期预后?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Dec;129(6):487-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832413.
10
Comparison of major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术术后主要胆管损伤的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Sep;76(9):788-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03868.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes and quality of life after repair of benign biliary stricture of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤所致良性胆管狭窄修复后的长期结局和生活质量
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s12664-025-01832-1.
2
Long-term patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective multicenter observational study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者长期报告的结局:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 28;99(35):e21683. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021683.
3
Outcomes and quality of life after major bile duct injury in long-term follow-up.
长期随访后主要胆管损伤的结果和生活质量。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2879-2888. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07726-x. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
The Cost and the Effectiveness of Cholangiography for the Diagnosis and Treatment of a Bile Duct Injury After Difficult Identification of the Cystic Duct.困难识别胆囊管后胆管损伤的胆管造影诊断和治疗的成本和效果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1430-1436. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04640-4. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.医源性胆管损伤的长期影响。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(1):10-21. doi: 10.1159/000496432. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Long-term effects and quality of life following definitive bile duct reconstruction.确定性胆管重建后的长期影响及生活质量
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12684. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012684.
7
Quality of Life in Patients with Background of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.医源性胆管损伤背景患者的生活质量
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2987-2991. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4564-3.
8
Postoperative Biliary Leak Treated with Chemical Bile Duct Ablation Using Absolute Ethanol: A Report of Two Cases.使用无水乙醇化学性胆管消融治疗术后胆漏:两例报告
Am J Case Rep. 2017 Aug 8;18:871-877. doi: 10.12659/ajcr.905093.
9
Gastric Bypass and Synchronous Cholecystectomy: a Matter of Numbers?胃旁路手术与同期胆囊切除术:数量问题?
Obes Surg. 2017 Aug;27(8):2174-2176. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2758-7.
10
Protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it rocket science?腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术方案:这很难吗?
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec 21;22(47):10287-10303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10287.