Bonomi L, Baravelli S, Cobbe C, Tomazzoli L
Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Verona, Italy.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(3):210-2. doi: 10.1007/BF00167869.
Intraocular pressure was evaluated in 414 eyes using Keeler Pulsair tonometry in comparison with values obtained by Goldmann tonometry. No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques. Landis K statistical analysis was used to evaluate the measurements obtained by two operators in 125 eyes, with the results indicating good reproducibility. In 20 eyes, a statistically significant difference was found between values obtained with patients in the seated vs supine positions, whereas measurements made with subjects' heads in a supported or unsupported position yielded no statistically different values.
使用基勒脉冲眼压计对414只眼睛进行眼压评估，并与戈德曼眼压计获得的值进行比较。两种技术之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。采用兰迪斯K统计分析来评估两名操作人员对125只眼睛的测量结果，结果表明重复性良好。在20只眼睛中，发现患者坐姿与仰卧位时获得的值之间存在统计学上的显著差异，而受试者头部处于支撑或无支撑位置时的测量值在统计学上没有差异。
