Alterman A I, Cacciola J S
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Jul;179(7):401-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199107000-00003.
This paper examines the question of whether antisocial personality disorder (APD) can be considered a viable substance abuse typology. The data for APD substance abusers are first reviewed with respect to six properties that apply to establishing the validity of a clinical typology. This is followed by a brief description of the historical context and development of current conceptualizations of antisocial personality. Some possible sources of diagnostic unreliability and instability that could serve to limit the validity of the APD diagnosis are then discussed. Finally, evidence indicating considerable psychiatric heterogeneity within APD substance abusers is described. The findings indicate that although APD substance abusers satisfy many of the criteria for a clinical subtype, the fit is sufficiently imprecise to suggest the need for further refinement. We attempt to point out some of the critical questions, issues, and lines of research that could help to guide future efforts to clarify, refine, and revise the APD formulation, particularly as it applies to substance abusers.
本文探讨了反社会人格障碍(APD)是否可被视为一种可行的药物滥用类型这一问题。首先针对适用于确立临床类型有效性的六个属性,对APD药物滥用者的数据进行了回顾。接下来简要描述了反社会人格的历史背景及当前概念的发展。然后讨论了一些可能导致诊断不可靠和不稳定的因素,这些因素可能会限制APD诊断的有效性。最后描述了表明APD药物滥用者中存在相当大精神异质性的证据。研究结果表明,尽管APD药物滥用者满足临床亚型的许多标准,但契合度不够精确,表明需要进一步完善。我们试图指出一些关键问题、议题和研究方向,这些有助于指导未来为阐明、完善和修订APD表述所做的努力,尤其是在其适用于药物滥用者的情况下。