• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[术后伤口感染的病因及后果]

[Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection].

作者信息

Rogy M, Függer R, Riedl E, Schulz F

机构信息

Chirurgische Universität, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Wien.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;376(3):172-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00250343.

DOI:10.1007/BF00250343
PMID:1870366
Abstract

The incidence of postoperative wound infection ranges between 4.6% and 36% after gastrointestinal operations respectively. To evaluate the factors which influence the postoperative wound infection we prospectively analyzed our patients between 1/1989 and 1/1990. 444 patients from three general surgical units of our clinic entered this study. The overall wound infection rate was 6.3%. We classified the patients into 3 operative groups: Group I: subcutaneous operations; Group II: intraabdominal operations without opening the GI-tract; Group III: gastrointestinal operations. Wound infection rate in group I was 1.8%, in group II 7.3% and in group III 13.7%. The differences were highly significant. Both univariate (chi 2-test) as well as a multivariate (Cox-Model) analysis were done. We figured out that classification of patients (p = 0.000), operation time (p = 0.009), operating room (p = 0.000), intensive care unit (p = 0.026), long-term antibiotic prophylaxis (p = 0.001), subcutaneous haematoma (p = 0.000) and length of closed drainage time (p = 0.001) are of significant value. In the Cox model the classification of patients into 3 groups surpassed all the other factors. Postoperative hospital stay was lengthened in patients with wound infection significantly (p = 0.0025).

摘要

胃肠道手术后,伤口感染发生率分别在4.6%至36%之间。为评估影响术后伤口感染的因素,我们对1989年1月至1990年1月间的患者进行了前瞻性分析。我们诊所三个普通外科单元的444例患者纳入了本研究。总体伤口感染率为6.3%。我们将患者分为3个手术组:第一组:皮下手术;第二组:未打开胃肠道的腹腔内手术;第三组:胃肠道手术。第一组伤口感染率为1.8%,第二组为7.3%,第三组为13.7%。差异具有高度显著性。我们进行了单因素分析(卡方检验)和多因素分析(Cox模型)。我们发现患者分类(p = 0.000)、手术时间(p = 0.009)、手术室(p = 0.000)、重症监护病房(p = 0.026)、长期抗生素预防(p = 0.001)、皮下血肿(p = 0.000)和闭式引流时间(p = 0.001)具有显著意义。在Cox模型中,将患者分为3组这一因素超过了所有其他因素。伤口感染患者的术后住院时间显著延长(p = 0.0025)。

相似文献

1
[Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection].[术后伤口感染的病因及后果]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;376(3):172-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00250343.
2
Risk Assessment of Abdominal Wall Thickness Measured on Pre-Operative Computerized Tomography for Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Surgery.术前计算机断层扫描测量的腹壁厚度对腹部手术后切口手术部位感染的风险评估
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jul;98(7):677-83.
3
[Postoperative wound infections. II. Risk factors related to surgery].
Przegl Lek. 1998;55(3):109-19.
4
Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.回肠造口术回纳术中皮下引流的必要性(DRASTAR)——一项随机对照双中心试验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):409-18. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1436-x. Epub 2016 May 1.
5
A prospective study of prevalence of 60-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery. An updated risk factor analysis.心脏手术后60天术后伤口感染患病率的前瞻性研究。风险因素分析的更新。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Oct;48(5):641-6.
6
[Postoperative wound infections. I. Population data and risk factors].[术后伤口感染。I. 人群数据及危险因素]
Przegl Lek. 1998;55(3):101-8.
7
[Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].[开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助胃切除术后并发症的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):184-189.
8
Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions.持续10年的伤口感染监测。结果、优势及未解决的问题。
Arch Surg. 1990 Jun;125(6):794-803. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410180120020.
9
[Incidence and surgical wound infection risk factors in breast cancer surgery].[乳腺癌手术的发病率及手术伤口感染危险因素]
Presse Med. 2000 Nov 18;29(35):1927-32.
10
Determinants of wound infection in gastrointestinal operations: the Israeli study of surgical infections.胃肠道手术伤口感染的决定因素:以色列外科感染研究
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90051-2.

引用本文的文献

1
[Splenectomy--a strictly aseptic intervention?].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(4):233-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00186364.

本文引用的文献

1
One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection?手术切口用一把刀而非两把刀。这会增加术后伤口感染的风险吗?
Arch Surg. 1984 Aug;119(8):917-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390200037009.
2
[Immune depression as a reaction to surgical operations--its significance for postoperative infection].[免疫抑制作为手术的一种反应——其对术后感染的意义]
Zentralbl Chir. 1987;112(14):873-84.
3
Drainage systems. Their role in wound healing.引流系统。它们在伤口愈合中的作用。
AORN J. 1987 Sep;46(3):442-55. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)66456-4.
4
Systemic perioperative prophylaxis in elective oncological colorectal surgery: cefotetan versus clindamicin plus aztreonam.
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1988;14(12):763-6.
5
[Postoperative wound infections in surgery of stomach cancer. A bacteriologic analysis].[胃癌手术中的术后伤口感染。细菌学分析]
Zentralbl Chir. 1989;114(18):1224-30.
6
A randomized prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis during abdominal surgery.腹部手术期间抗生素预防的随机前瞻性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:79-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.79.
7
[Effect of time of operation and clinic organization on postoperative complications].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1989;374(2):84-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01261615.
8
Postoperative wound scoring.术后伤口评分
Biomed Pharmacother. 1989;43(9):669-73. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(89)90085-1.
9
[Preventive use of single dose antibiotics in acute appendicitis. Results of a prospective randomized clinical study].[急性阑尾炎单剂量抗生素预防性使用。一项前瞻性随机临床研究的结果]
Zentralbl Chir. 1989;114(20):1348-54.
10
[Duration of the preventive use of antibiotics in colorectal surgery--single administration versus short-term prevention].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1989;374(5):272-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01261469.