• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Delirium detection in clinical practice and research: critique of current tools and suggestions for future development.

作者信息

Kean Jacob, Ryan Karen

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, 200 South Jordan Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2008 Sep;65(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.024.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.024
PMID:18707948
Abstract

Delirium is underrecognized clinically. Many tools have been developed to assist with the diagnosis of delirium, and they vary greatly in purpose, quality, and administration time. It is suggested that future development of delirium assessment instruments be guided by a dichotomization of raters into expert and nonexpert groups. Careful consideration of the needs of the two groups suggests that assessment instruments designed for nonexperts should be entirely objective, whereas those instruments developed for experts should include the full range of constructs associated with the syndrome. This conceptualization is explored in detail, and existing assessment instruments are considered briefly in light of this position.

摘要

相似文献

1
Delirium detection in clinical practice and research: critique of current tools and suggestions for future development.
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Sep;65(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.024.
2
Winning the cancer fight: a look at the future.战胜癌症:展望未来。
Prim Care. 2009 Dec;36(4):859-65; table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.07.003.
3
[Needs assessment: legal foundations, current practice and research topics - thinking outside the box …].[需求评估:法律基础、当前实践与研究主题——跳出框框思考……]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2011 Feb;50(1):4-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270436. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
4
Frontiers of auditory prosthesis research: implications for clinical practice.听觉假体研究前沿:对临床实践的启示
Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 22.
5
Watching practice patterns change.观察实践模式的变化。
South Hosp. 1992 Jan-Feb;58(1):14-5.
6
[Diabetology in the context between research and patient care].[研究与患者护理背景下的糖尿病学]
Internist (Berl). 2005 Nov;46(11):1283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00108-005-1451-4.
7
A critique of instruments and methods to detect, diagnose, and rate delirium.对检测、诊断和评估谵妄的工具与方法的批判性分析。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995 Jan;10(1):35-77. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)00066-T.
8
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者和作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后,基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从?”一文的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
9
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后,基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从?”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
10
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后,基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从?”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.

引用本文的文献

1
Natriuretic Peptides as a Predictor for Delirium After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.利钠肽作为心脏手术后谵妄的预测指标:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 25;14(5):1533. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051533.
2
Delirium in the intensive care unit and its importance in the post-operative context: A review.重症监护病房中的谵妄及其在术后背景下的重要性:综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 30;10:1071854. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1071854. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of verbal and computerised months backwards tests in a hospitalized older population.
住院老年人群中言语和计算机化数月倒背测试的比较。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Nov;34(11):2713-2719. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02205-w. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
A Machine Learning Approach for Investigating Delirium as a Multifactorial Syndrome.一种用于研究谵妄作为一种多因素综合征的机器学习方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(13):7105. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137105.
5
Older trauma patients are at high risk of delirium, especially those with underlying dementia or baseline frailty.老年创伤患者发生谵妄的风险很高,尤其是那些患有潜在痴呆症或基线虚弱的患者。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Apr 27;6(1):e000639. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000639. eCollection 2021.
6
Development of the AL-O-A Score for Delirium Screening in Acute Internal Medicine: a Monocentric Prospective Study.急性内科中用于谵妄筛查的 AL-O-A 评分的制定:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1980-1988. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06502-w. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Protocol for validation of the 4AT, a rapid screening tool for delirium: a multicentre prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.4AT谵妄快速筛查工具验证方案:一项多中心前瞻性诊断试验准确性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e015572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015572.
8
Management of delirium in palliative care: a review.姑息治疗中谵妄的管理:综述
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Mar;17(3):550. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0550-8.
9
The frequency of missed delirium in patients referred to palliative care in a comprehensive cancer center.在一家综合癌症中心接受姑息治疗的患者中,谵妄漏诊的发生率。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2427-33. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2610-3. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people.新型谵妄快速筛查工具4AT的验证:对234名住院老年人的研究
Age Ageing. 2014 Jul;43(4):496-502. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu021. Epub 2014 Mar 2.