Suppr超能文献

对检测、诊断和评估谵妄的工具与方法的批判性分析。

A critique of instruments and methods to detect, diagnose, and rate delirium.

作者信息

Smith M J, Breitbart W S, Platt M M

机构信息

Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995 Jan;10(1):35-77. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)00066-T.

Abstract

This document reviews existing instruments for evaluation of delirium. Instruments have been grouped into four categories: tests that screen for cognitive impairment, delirium diagnostic instruments, delirium-specific numerical rating scales, and laboratory and paraclinical exams. Analysis of instruments was based on comparison of their psychometric properties as well as subjective judgment. Guidelines are suggested for choosing the appropriate instrument according to the type of clinical evaluation or delirium research envisaged. Important factors in choosing an instrument, besides the appropriateness of its psychometric characteristics, include administration time constraints, level of rater expertise, and patient capabilities. By familiarizing investigators with the variety of evaluation instruments available, this work should permit more appropriate instrument selection in future studies on delirium.

摘要

本文回顾了现有的谵妄评估工具。这些工具被分为四类:用于筛查认知障碍的测试、谵妄诊断工具、谵妄专用数字评定量表以及实验室和辅助检查。对工具的分析基于其心理测量特性的比较以及主观判断。根据所设想的临床评估类型或谵妄研究,建议了选择合适工具的指南。除了其心理测量特征的适宜性外,选择工具时的重要因素还包括施测时间限制、评估者专业水平和患者能力。通过使研究人员熟悉现有的各种评估工具,这项工作应能在未来的谵妄研究中实现更合适的工具选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验